» Articles » PMID: 26834706

Bacterial Vaginosis Biofilms: Challenges to Current Therapies and Emerging Solutions

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2016 Feb 3
PMID 26834706
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common genital tract infection in women during their reproductive years and it has been associated with serious health complications, such as preterm delivery and acquisition or transmission of several sexually transmitted agents. BV is characterized by a reduction of beneficial lactobacilli and a significant increase in number of anaerobic bacteria, including Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, Mobiluncus spp., Bacteroides spp. and Prevotella spp.. Being polymicrobial in nature, BV etiology remains unclear. However, it is certain that BV involves the presence of a thick vaginal multi-species biofilm, where G. vaginalis is the predominant species. Similar to what happens in many other biofilm-related infections, standard antibiotics, like metronidazole, are unable to fully eradicate the vaginal biofilm, which can explain the high recurrence rates of BV. Furthermore, antibiotic therapy can also cause a negative impact on the healthy vaginal microflora. These issues sparked the interest in developing alternative therapeutic strategies. This review provides a quick synopsis of the currently approved and available antibiotics for BV treatment while presenting an overview of novel strategies that are being explored for the treatment of this disorder, with special focus on natural compounds that are able to overcome biofilm-associated antibiotic resistance.

Citing Articles

Immunoinformatic evaluation for the development of a potent multi-epitope vaccine against bacterial vaginosis caused by Gardnerella vaginalis.

Motamedi H, Shoja S, Abbasi M PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0316699.

PMID: 40014550 PMC: 11867334. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316699.


Mechanisms of S. agalactiae promoting G. vaginalis biofilm formation leading to recurrence of BV.

Li M, Zeng Z, Wang X, Liu Y, Wei H, Liu J NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024; 10(1):138.

PMID: 39604369 PMC: 11603151. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-024-00601-w.


Ceragenins Prevent the Development of Murine Vaginal Infection Caused by .

Wnorowska U, Piktel E, Daniluk T, Paprocka P, Savage P, Durnas B Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(11).

PMID: 39598357 PMC: 11597204. DOI: 10.3390/ph17111445.


Evaluation of the Vaginal Panel Realtime PCR kit (Vircell, SL) for diagnosing vaginitis: A comparative study with routinely used diagnostics.

Amor I, Alberola A, De Salazar A, Vinuela L, Ubeda-Portugues S, Galan M PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313414.

PMID: 39504318 PMC: 11540222. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313414.


The cAMP receptor protein from Gardnerella vaginalis is not regulated by ligands.

Dong H, Zhang J, Zhang K, Zhang F, Wang S, Wang Q Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1233.

PMID: 39354127 PMC: 11445507. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06957-1.


References
1.
Rothman K, Funch D, Alfredson T, Brady J, Dreyer N . Randomized field trial of vaginal douching, pelvic inflammatory disease and pregnancy. Epidemiology. 2003; 14(3):340-8. View

2.
Ison C, TAYLOR R, Link C, Buckett P, Harris J, Easmon C . Local treatment for bacterial vaginosis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987; 295(6603):886. PMC: 1247931. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.295.6603.886. View

3.
Guerra B, Ghi T, Quarta S, Morselli-Labate A, Lazzarotto T, Pilu G . Pregnancy outcome after early detection of bacterial vaginosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 128(1-2):40-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.12.024. View

4.
Paavonen J, Mangioni C, Martin M, Wajszczuk C . Vaginal clindamycin and oral metronidazole for bacterial vaginosis: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96(2):256-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00902-9. View

5.
Hantoushzadeh S, Golshahi F, Javadian P, KHazardoost S, Aram S, Hashemi S . Comparative efficacy of probiotic yoghurt and clindamycin in treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women: a randomized clinical trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011; 25(7):1021-4. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2011.614654. View