» Articles » PMID: 26834354

Motor Imagery Muscle Contraction Strength Influences Spinal Motor Neuron Excitability and Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Activity

Overview
Journal J Phys Ther Sci
Date 2016 Feb 3
PMID 26834354
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in spinal motor neuron excitability and autonomic nervous system activity during motor imagery of isometric thenar muscle activity at 10% and 50% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). [Methods] The F-waves and low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio were recorded at rest, during motor imagery, and post-trial. For motor imagery trials, subjects were instructed to imagine thenar muscle activity at 10% and 50% MVC while holding the sensor of a pinch meter for 5 min. [Results] The F-waves and LF/HF ratio during motor imagery at 50% MVC were significantly increased compared with those at rest, whereas those during motor imagery at 10% MVC were not significantly different from those at rest. The relative values of the F/M amplitude ratio during motor imagery at 50% MVC were significantly higher than those at 10% MVC. The relative values of persistence and the LF/HF ratio during motor imagery were similar during motor imagery at the two muscle contraction strengths. [Conclusion] Motor imagery can increase the spinal motor neuron excitability and cardiac sympathetic nerve activity. Motor imagery at 50% MVC may be more effective than motor imagery at 10% MVC.

Citing Articles

Motor Imagery and Frontal Head Oxygenation: An fNIRS Study.

Tsuchiya W, Nagao K, Moriya M Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022; 1395:81-85.

PMID: 36527618 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-14190-4_14.


Stand Up to Excite the Spine: Neuromuscular, Autonomic, and Cardiometabolic Responses During Motor Imagery in Standing vs. Sitting Posture.

Grospretre S, Marusic U, Gimenez P, Ennequin G, Mourot L, Isacco L Front Physiol. 2021; 12:762452.

PMID: 34887774 PMC: 8649772. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.762452.


Combining motor imagery with action observation training does not lead to a greater autonomic nervous system response than motor imagery alone during simple and functional movements: a randomized controlled trial.

Cuenca-Martinez F, Suso-Marti L, Grande-Alonso M, Paris-Alemany A, La Touche R PeerJ. 2018; 6:e5142.

PMID: 30002975 PMC: 6037142. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5142.


Effects and Dose-Response Relationships of Motor Imagery Practice on Strength Development in Healthy Adult Populations: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Paravlic A, Slimani M, Tod D, Marusic U, Milanovic Z, Pisot R Sports Med. 2018; 48(5):1165-1187.

PMID: 29541965 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-018-0874-8.

References
1.
. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996; 17(3):354-81. View

2.
Park W, Li S . No graded responses of finger muscles to TMS during motor imagery of isometric finger forces. Neurosci Lett. 2011; 494(3):255-9. PMC: 3085454. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.027. View

3.
Cowley P, Clark B, Ploutz-Snyder L . Kinesthetic motor imagery and spinal excitability: the effect of contraction intensity and spatial localization. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 119(8):1849-1856. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.04.004. View

4.
Williams J, Pearce A, Loporto M, Morris T, Holmes P . The relationship between corticospinal excitability during motor imagery and motor imagery ability. Behav Brain Res. 2011; 226(2):369-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.014. View

5.
Liversedge , Findlay . Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(1):6-14. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01418-7. View