» Articles » PMID: 26833790

Gene Regulation and Speciation in House Mice

Overview
Journal Genome Res
Specialty Genetics
Date 2016 Feb 3
PMID 26833790
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One approach to understanding the process of speciation is to characterize the genetic architecture of post-zygotic isolation. As gene regulation requires interactions between loci, negative epistatic interactions between divergent regulatory elements might underlie hybrid incompatibilities and contribute to reproductive isolation. Here, we take advantage of a cross between house mouse subspecies, where hybrid dysfunction is largely unidirectional, to test several key predictions about regulatory divergence and reproductive isolation. Regulatory divergence between Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus was characterized by studying allele-specific expression in fertile hybrid males using mRNA-sequencing of whole testes. We found extensive regulatory divergence between M. m. musculus and M. m. domesticus, largely attributable to cis-regulatory changes. When both cis and trans changes occurred, they were observed in opposition much more often than expected under a neutral model, providing strong evidence of widespread compensatory evolution. We also found evidence for lineage-specific positive selection on a subset of genes related to transcriptional regulation. Comparisons of fertile and sterile hybrid males identified a set of genes that were uniquely misexpressed in sterile individuals. Lastly, we discovered a nonrandom association between these genes and genes showing evidence of compensatory evolution, consistent with the idea that regulatory interactions might contribute to Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities and be important in speciation.

Citing Articles

Different complex regulatory phenotypes underlie hybrid male sterility in divergent rodent crosses.

Hunnicutt K, Callahan C, Callahan C, Keeble S, Moore E, Good J Genetics. 2024; 229(2).

PMID: 39601270 PMC: 11796465. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae198.


Stabilizing selection and adaptation shape and gene expression variation in .

Bell A, Valencia F, Paaby A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39464158 PMC: 11507773. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.15.618466.


Insertion of short L1 sequences generates inter-strain histone acetylation differences in the mouse.

Boyboy B, Ichiyanagi K Mob DNA. 2024; 15(1):11.

PMID: 38730323 PMC: 11084082. DOI: 10.1186/s13100-024-00321-0.


Evolution and genetics of accessory gland transcriptome divergence between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Majane A, Cridland J, Blair L, Begun D Genetics. 2024; 227(2).

PMID: 38518250 PMC: 11151936. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae039.


Do genetic loci that cause reproductive isolation in the lab inhibit gene flow in nature?.

Frayer M, Payseur B Evolution. 2024; 78(6):1025-1038.

PMID: 38490748 PMC: 11135621. DOI: 10.1093/evolut/qpae044.


References
1.
King M, Wilson A . Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science. 1975; 188(4184):107-16. DOI: 10.1126/science.1090005. View

2.
Cowles C, Hirschhorn J, Altshuler D, Lander E . Detection of regulatory variation in mouse genes. Nat Genet. 2002; 32(3):432-7. DOI: 10.1038/ng992. View

3.
Rifkin S, Kim J, White K . Evolution of gene expression in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Nat Genet. 2003; 33(2):138-44. DOI: 10.1038/ng1086. View

4.
Oka A, Mita A, Sakurai-Yamatani N, Yamamoto H, Takagi N, Takano-Shimizu T . Hybrid breakdown caused by substitution of the X chromosome between two mouse subspecies. Genetics. 2004; 166(2):913-24. PMC: 1470736. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.2.913. View

5.
Su A, Wiltshire T, Batalov S, Lapp H, Ching K, Block D . A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(16):6062-7. PMC: 395923. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0400782101. View