» Articles » PMID: 26832349

Transvaginal Specimen Removal in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2016 Feb 3
PMID 26832349
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The demand for urological surgical treatment associated with better cosmesis, lower morbidity rates and shorter hospitalization constantly grows. The transvaginal route has been proposed in an attempt to avoid long abdominal incisions for the removal of the large laparoscopic specimens. Moreover, the transvaginal NOTES approach represents a promising evolution of laparoscopic surgery to a more "minimally invasive" alternative. The current review summarizes the available experience in the literature in transvaginal conventional laparoscopy and NOTES in urology, gynecology and general surgery. The clinical outcome is presented. The most important issues associated with the transvaginal approach are the complications and the postoperative sexual function. These issues are presented.

Citing Articles

Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chang J, Xu H, Zhao Y, Wee I, Ang J, Tan E Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):172.

PMID: 38829526 PMC: 11147895. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03361-5.


Assessment of women's sexual quality of life after benign adnexal surgery using vNOTES approach in comparison to conventional laparoscopy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Krull E, Lambat Emery S, Viviano M, Aerts L, Petignat P, Dubuisson J BMJ Open. 2023; 13(9):e073691.

PMID: 37678943 PMC: 10496722. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073691.


Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.

You C, Du Y, Wang H, Peng L, Wei T, Zhang X Front Oncol. 2020; 10:583979.

PMID: 33194725 PMC: 7658533. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.583979.


Response of the authors to comment by Lagana et al. on: Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery (World J Urol. 2016 Jun; 34(6):779-87).

Kallidonis P, Panagopoulos V, Kyriazis I, Vasilas M, Liatsikos E World J Urol. 2017; 35(7):1157.

PMID: 28612107 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2059-8.


Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery: feasibility and possible complications during the incision of the posterior vaginal wall.

Lagana A, Vitale S, Palmara V, Ban Frangez H, Triolo O World J Urol. 2016; 35(7):1155-1156.

PMID: 27757537 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1955-7.

References
1.
Zou X, Zhang G, Xiao R, Yuan Y, Wu G, Wang X . Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: first clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25(12):3767-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1786-y. View

2.
Wada N, Tanabe M, Kataoka F, Kitagawa Y . [Transvaginal hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery appendectomy]. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2013; 114(6):308-11. View

3.
Targarona E, Gomez C, Rovira R, Pernas J, Balague C, Guarner-Argente C . NOTES-assisted transvaginal splenectomy: the next step in the minimally invasive approach to the spleen. Surg Innov. 2009; 16(3):218-22. DOI: 10.1177/1553350609345488. View

4.
Jayaraman S, Schlachta C . Transgastric and transperineal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in an appendectomy test bed. Surg Innov. 2009; 16(3):223-7. DOI: 10.1177/1553350609342076. View

5.
Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Ciravolo G, Rampinelli F, Braga M, Boni L . A new laparoscopic-transvaginal technique for rectosigmoid resection in patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90(5):1964-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.002. View