» Articles » PMID: 26827613

The Influence of Ultrasound Measurement Techniques on the Age-related Differences in Achilles Tendon Size

Overview
Journal Exp Gerontol
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2016 Feb 2
PMID 26827613
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Achilles tendon (AT) properties change with age, however the extent to which aging influences the size of the AT may be influenced by the measurement technique. The purpose of this study was to 1) examine the age-related differences in AT size using measures of cross-sectional area (CSA) and thickness, and 2) to determine the test-retest reliability and minimum difference (MD) values of these measures. The size of the AT was examined in 19 young (19.79 ± 2.3 years) and 18 older (69.4 ± 3.1 years) healthy men on two separate occasions using an ultrasonography. The CSA and thickness of the AT were determined by separate transverse and longitudinal scans on the right leg at the same distance from the medial malleolus, respectively. Prior to and after accounting for body mass, AT CSA was larger (P ≤ 0.01) in the older men (64.49 ± 13.87 mm(2)) when compared to the younger men (44.12 ± 16.04 mm(2)), however there were no differences in AT thickness between age groups (P=0.96). In addition, there was no systematic error (P>0.05) between testing days, and the intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement (expressed as a % of the mean), and MD values for CSA and thickness ranged from 0.80-0.98, 5.46-8.68%, and 5.65-7.94 mm(2) and 0.51-0.86 mm, respectively between both groups. These findings suggest that the reliability of the CSA and thickness measurements were similar, however, CSA was a more sensitive measure to detect the age-related changes of AT size.

Citing Articles

Differences in the cross-sectional area along the ankle tendons with both age and sex.

Mansur H, Durigan J, de Noronha M, Kjaer M, Magnusson S, de Araujo B J Anat. 2022; 242(2):213-223.

PMID: 36250976 PMC: 9877482. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13774.


Sex Differences in the Morphological and Mechanical Properties of the Achilles Tendon.

Zhang X, Deng L, Xiao S, Li L, Fu W Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(17).

PMID: 34501564 PMC: 8430544. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18178974.


On the morphological relations of the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia via the calcaneus: a cadaveric study.

Singh A, Zwirner J, Templer F, Kieser D, Klima S, Hammer N Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):5986.

PMID: 33727610 PMC: 7966405. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85251-0.


Alterations in Leg Extensor Muscle-Tendon Unit Biomechanical Properties With Ageing and Mechanical Loading.

McCrum C, Leow P, Epro G, Konig M, Meijer K, Karamanidis K Front Physiol. 2018; 9:150.

PMID: 29541035 PMC: 5835978. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00150.


Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are not interchangeable to assess the Achilles tendon cross-sectional-area.

Kruse A, Stafilidis S, Tilp M Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016; 117(1):73-82.

PMID: 27838848 PMC: 5306331. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3500-1.