» Articles » PMID: 26826154

Engaging Patients Through Open Notes: an Evaluation Using Mixed Methods

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Jan 31
PMID 26826154
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: (A) To gain insights into the experiences of patients invited to view their doctors' visit notes, with a focus on those who review multiple notes; (B) to examine the relationships among fully transparent electronic medical records and quality of care, the patient-doctor relationship, patient engagement, self-care, self-management skills and clinical outcomes.

Design: Mixed methods qualitative study: analyses of survey data, including content analysis of free-text answers, and quantitative-descriptive measures combined with semistructured individual interviews, patient activation measures, and member checks.

Setting: Greater Boston, USA.

Participants: Patients cared for by primary care physicians (PCPs) at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center who had electronic access to their PCP visit notes. Among those submitting surveys, 576 free-text answers were identified and analysed (414 from female patients, 162 from male patients; 23-88 years). In addition, 13 patients (9 female, 4 male; 58-87 years) were interviewed.

Results: Patient experiences indicate improved understanding (of health information), better relationships (with doctors), better quality (adherence and compliance; keeping track) and improved self-care (patient-centredness, empowerment). Patients want more doctors to offer access to their notes, and some wish to contribute to their generation. Those patients with repeated experience reviewing notes express fewer concerns and more perceived benefits.

Conclusions: As the use of fully transparent medical records spreads, it is important to gain a deeper understanding of possible benefits or harms, and to characterise target populations that may require varying modes of delivery. Patient desires for expansion of this practice extend to specialty care and settings beyond the physician's office. Patients are also interested in becoming involved actively in the generation of their medical records. The OpenNotes movement may increase patient activation and engagement in important ways.

Citing Articles

Addressing Note Bloat: Solutions for Effective Clinical Documentation.

Genes N, Sills J, Heaton H, Shy B, Scofi J J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025; 6(1):100031.

PMID: 40012671 PMC: 11852943. DOI: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100031.


Experiences of Older Mental Health Patients and Their Care Partners Using a Proxy Account to Access Open Notes: Qualitative Interview Study.

Meier-Diedrich E, Esch T, Hagglund M, Heinze M, Hochwarter S, Speck J JMIR Aging. 2025; 8:e66690.

PMID: 39993284 PMC: 11894351. DOI: 10.2196/66690.


Adolescent and parental proxy online record access: analysis of the empirical evidence based on four bioethical principles.

Hagstrom J, Hagglund M, Blease C BMC Med Ethics. 2025; 26(1):27.

PMID: 39979965 PMC: 11841295. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-025-01182-9.


Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records and Information Practices in Mental Health Care Contexts: Scoping Review.

Kariotis T, Prictor M, Gray K, Chang S J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e54973.

PMID: 39918859 PMC: 11845895. DOI: 10.2196/54973.


Identifying Facilitators and Inhibitors of Shared Understanding: An Ethnography of Diagnosis Communication in Acute Medical Settings.

Cox C, Hatfield T, Willars J, Fritz Z Health Expect. 2024; 27(4):e14180.

PMID: 39180375 PMC: 11344224. DOI: 10.1111/hex.14180.


References
1.
El-Kareh R, Gandhi T, Poon E, Newmark L, Ungar J, Lipsitz S . Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record. J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 24(4):464-8. PMC: 2659149. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-0906-z. View

2.
Bjoernes C, Laursen B, Delmar C, Cummings E, Nohr C . A dialogue-based Web application enhances personalized access to healthcare professionals--an intervention study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12:96. PMC: 3519767. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-96. View

3.
Ridsdale L, Hudd S . What do patients want and not want to see about themselves on the computer screen: a qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1998; 15(4):180-3. DOI: 10.3109/02813439709035024. View

4.
Kuhn T, Basch P, Barr M, Yackel T . Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162(4):301-3. DOI: 10.7326/M14-2128. View

5.
Bronson D, Rubin A, Tufo H . Patient education through record sharing. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1978; 4(12):2-4. View