» Articles » PMID: 26819644

What Is the Appropriate Clinical Target Volume for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? Debate and Consensus Based on Pathological and Clinical Outcomes

Overview
Journal J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Jan 29
PMID 26819644
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate delineation of clinical target volume (CTV) is critical in the effective management of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of esophagus using radiation therapy. Accurate delineation may improve the probability of local control and reduce the risk of complications. However, there are no consistent standards on the proper size of the margins added to the gross tumor volume (GTV). Different institutions and radiation oncologists have discordant opinions. In this paper, we review pathological and clinical outcomes to determine the most appropriate CTV for squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of esophagus. The CTV for esophageal carcinoma should ensure that all subclinical lesions are encompassed regardless of the physical distance. The most precise method for delineating a reasonable CTV is to combine advanced imaging techniques, such as PET/CT and EUS, which allows the detection and prediction of subclinical lesions based on tumor characteristics such as the pathological type, differentiation, T disease, length and lymph node status.

Citing Articles

Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of deep learning based auto-segmentation for clinical target volume on breast cancer.

Zhong Y, Guo Y, Fang Y, Wu Z, Wang J, Hu W J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(7):e13951.

PMID: 36920901 PMC: 10338811. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13951.


Assessing failure patterns of radical intent radiation strategies in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the esophagus.

Mishra S, Ahmad F, Singh S, Singh R, Das K, Kumar S Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2020; 4(3):e1332.

PMID: 33369258 PMC: 8222558. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1332.


Cardiotoxicity of radiation therapy in esophageal cancer.

Vosmik M, Hodek M, Buka D, Sykorova P, Grepl J, Paluska P Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020; 25(3):318-322.

PMID: 32194352 PMC: 7078499. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.02.005.


Subclinical Lesions of the Primary Clinical Target Volume Margin in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Association With FDG PET/CT.

Han D, Yuan Y, Chai J, Zhang G, Wang L, Ren A Front Oncol. 2019; 9:336.

PMID: 31114759 PMC: 6503095. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00336.


Expression of and long-chain non-coding RNAs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma tissues is predictive of patient prognosis.

Kang K, Huang Y, Li H, Guo S Arch Med Sci. 2018; 14(4):752-759.

PMID: 30002691 PMC: 6040126. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2018.73713.

References
1.
von Rahden B, Stein H, Feith M, Becker K, Siewert J . Lymphatic vessel invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with primary resected adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(4):874-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.12.151. View

2.
Tsutsui S, Kuwano H, Watanabe M, Kitamura M, Sugimachi K . Resection margin for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg. 1995; 222(2):193-202. PMC: 1234778. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199508000-00012. View

3.
Nishimaki T, Suzuki T, Tanaka Y, Aizawa K, Hatakeyama K, Muto T . Intramural metastases from thoracic esophageal cancer: local indicators of advanced disease. World J Surg. 1996; 20(1):32-7. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900006. View

4.
Nishimaki T, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Obinata I, Komukai S, Hatakeyama K . Extended radical esophagectomy for superficially invasive carcinoma of the esophagus. Surgery. 1999; 125(2):142-7. View

5.
Tanaka A, Matsumura E, Yosikawa H, Uchida T, Machidera N, Kubo R . An evaluation of neural invasion in esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 1998; 28(9):873-8. DOI: 10.1007/s005950050245. View