» Articles » PMID: 26817902

Impact of Breast Cancer Subtype Defined by Immunohistochemistry Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status on the Incidence of Immediate Postmastectomy Reconstruction

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Jan 29
PMID 26817902
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Immediate postmastectomy reconstruction has become an increasingly popular choice for breast cancer patients recently. However, whether molecular subtype of cancer impacts the incidence of breast reconstruction is unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between breast cancer subtype defined by immunohistochemistry hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and recent rates of immediate postmastectomy reconstruction in the United States.The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to evaluate stage I-III breast cancer patients with different subtypes who underwent either mastectomy alone or mastectomy plus reconstruction between 2010 and 2012. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors influencing the incidence of immediate reconstruction.Of 47,123 women included, 33.1% (10,712/32,376) of HR+/HER2-, 33.1% (1912/5768) of HR+/HER2+, 29.6% (850/2875) of HR-/HER2+, and 27.7% (1689/6104) of triple negative breast cancer patients received immediate breast reconstruction (chi-square test, P < 0.001), respectively. Thus, HER2-overexpressing and triple negative breast cancer patients received significantly less breast reconstruction. After adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, or clinicopathologic factors, HER2-overexpressing (OR 0.896, 95% CI 0.817-0.984) and triple negative (OR 0.806, 95% CI 0.751-0.866) breast cancer patients remained less likely to undergo immediate postmastectomy reconstruction compared with HR+/HER2- or HR+/HER2+ patients. No significant difference was found in the type of reconstruction among different subtypes. Subgroup analysis showed that the difference of breast reconstruction rates among distinct subtypes varied with different grade and stage groups, and the association between breast cancer subtype and the reconstruction rate was not significant in low grade and early stage patients.This population-based study determined that breast cancer subtype was an independent predictor for the utilization of immediate postmastectomy reconstruction. Patients with HER2-overexpressing or triple negative breast cancer subtype that has relatively higher risk of local recurrence, were less likely to receive immediate breast reconstruction than those with luminal tumors. Further studies are needed to disclose more underlying reasons of different reconstruction incidences for distinct subtypes of breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Immediate breast reconstruction on overall and breast cancer-specific survival: A propensity score matched analysis.

Xu Q, Wan Y, Sun Z, Tan X, Zong X Breast. 2025; 80:104422.

PMID: 39985842 PMC: 11904591. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104422.


Diagnostic value of applying preoperative breast ultrasound and clinicopathologic features to predict axillary lymph node burden in early invasive breast cancer: a study of 1247 patients.

Shao H, Sun Y, Na Z, Jing H, Li B, Wang Q BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):112.

PMID: 38254060 PMC: 10804462. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11853-2.


Racial Disparities in Breast Reconstruction at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Connors S, Goodman M, Myckatyn T, Margenthaler J, Gehlert S J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021; 9(6):2323-2333.

PMID: 34647274 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-021-01169-3.


Comparison of survival outcomes of locally advanced breast cancer patients receiving post-mastectomy radiotherapy with and without immediate breast reconstruction: a population-based analysis.

Wu S, Zhang W, Sun J, Lin Q, He Z Cancer Manag Res. 2018; 10:1993-2002.

PMID: 30034254 PMC: 6049048. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S162430.


Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study.

Qin Q, Tan Q, Lian B, Mo Q, Huang Z, Wei C Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(5):e9766.

PMID: 29384865 PMC: 5805437. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009766.


References
1.
Eriksen C, Frisell J, Wickman M, Lidbrink E, Krawiec K, Sandelin K . Immediate reconstruction with implants in women with invasive breast cancer does not affect oncological safety in a matched cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 127(2):439-46. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1437-y. View

2.
Katz S, Hawley S, Abrahamse P, Morrow M, Friese C, Alderman A . Does it matter where you go for breast surgery?: attending surgeon's influence on variation in receipt of mastectomy for breast cancer. Med Care. 2010; 48(10):892-9. PMC: 3176679. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ef97df. View

3.
Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest A . Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy. Lancet. 1983; 1(8322):459-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91452-6. View

4.
Fernandez-Delgado J, Lopez-Pedraza M, Blasco J, Andradas-Aragones E, Sanchez-Mendez J, Sordo-Miralles G . Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction. Ann Oncol. 2008; 19(8):1430-1434. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn153. View

5.
Kneubil M, Brollo J, Botteri E, Curigliano G, Rotmensz N, Goldhirsch A . Breast cancer subtype approximations and loco-regional recurrence after immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013; 39(3):260-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.12.004. View