» Articles » PMID: 26817770

The Effect of Activation Level on Muscle Function During Locomotion: Are Optimal Lengths and Velocities Always Used?

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2016 Jan 29
PMID 26817770
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Skeletal muscle exhibits broad functional diversity, despite its inherent length and velocity constraints. The observed variation in morphology and physiology is assumed to have evolved to allow muscle to operate at its optimal length and velocity during locomotion. Here, we used the variation in optimum lengths and velocities that occurs with muscle activation level to experimentally test this assumption. Muscle ergometry and sonomicrometry were used to characterize force-length and power-velocity relationships, and in vivo operating lengths and velocities, at a range of activation levels. Operating lengths and velocities were mapped onto activation level specific force-length and power-velocity relationships to determine whether they tracked changing optima. Operating velocities decreased in line with decreased optimal velocities, suggesting that optimal velocities are always used. However, operating lengths did not change with changing optima. At high activation levels, fibres used an optimal range of lengths. However, at lower activation levels, fibres appeared to operate on the ascending limb of sub-maximally activated force-length relationships. This suggests that optimal lengths are only used when demand is greatest. This study provides the first mapping of operating lengths to activation level-specific optima, and as such, provides insight into our assumptions about the factors that determine muscle performance during locomotion.

Citing Articles

Does the unusual phenomenon of sustained force circumvent the speed-endurance trade-off in the jaw muscle of the southern alligator lizard (Elgaria multicarinata)?.

Nguyen A, Leong K, Holt N J Exp Biol. 2024; 228(2).

PMID: 39690956 PMC: 11832124. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.247979.


Investigating in vivo force and work production of rat medial gastrocnemius at varying locomotor speeds using a muscle avatar.

Bemis C, Konow N, Daley M, Nishikawa K J Exp Biol. 2024; 227(22).

PMID: 39445492 PMC: 11586523. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.248177.


Linking in vivo muscle dynamics to force-length and force-velocity properties reveals that guinea fowl lateral gastrocnemius operates at shorter than optimal lengths.

Schwaner M, Mayfield D, Azizi E, Daley M J Exp Biol. 2024; 227(15).

PMID: 38873800 PMC: 11418180. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.246879.


Linking muscle dynamics to force-length and force-velocity reveals that guinea fowl lateral gastrocnemius operates at shorter than optimal lengths.

Schwaner M, Mayfield D, Azizi E, Daley M bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37905058 PMC: 10614737. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.11.561922.


Muscle prestimulation tunes velocity preflex in simulated perturbed hopping.

Izzi F, Mo A, Schmitt S, Badri-Sprowitz A, Haeufle D Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4559.

PMID: 36941316 PMC: 10027857. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31179-6.


References
1.
Vervuert I, Brussow N, Bochnia M, Cuddeford D, Coenen M . Electromyographic evaluation of masseter muscle activity in horses fed (i) different types of roughage and (ii) maize after different hay allocations. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2012; 97(3):515-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01292.x. View

2.
Arnold E, Hamner S, Seth A, Millard M, Delp S . How muscle fiber lengths and velocities affect muscle force generation as humans walk and run at different speeds. J Exp Biol. 2013; 216(Pt 11):2150-60. PMC: 3656509. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.075697. View

3.
Schiaffino S, Reggiani C . Fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev. 2011; 91(4):1447-531. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2010. View

4.
Burkholder T, Lieber R . Sarcomere length operating range of vertebrate muscles during movement. J Exp Biol. 2001; 204(Pt 9):1529-36. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.9.1529. View

5.
Astley H, Roberts T . The mechanics of elastic loading and recoil in anuran jumping. J Exp Biol. 2014; 217(Pt 24):4372-8. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.110296. View