» Articles » PMID: 26817661

Tape Stripping Technique for Stratum Corneum Protein Analysis

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Jan 29
PMID 26817661
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the amount of protein in stratum corneum in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients and healthy controls, using tape stripping technique. Furthermore, to compare two different methods for protein assessment. Tape stripping was performed in AD patients and healthy controls to collect stratum corneum samples and subsequently analysed with two different methods: Squame Scan, which gives an estimate of total protein (soluble and insoluble) and Micro BCA protein determination kit which measures soluble protein. Significant differences in cumulative protein content between AD lesional, AD non-lesional and healthy control skin was found using the Squame Scan as well as the Micro BCA protein determination kit. AD patients had significantly lower amount of protein, both total protein and soluble protein compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, soluble protein formed 82% of total protein in AD lesional skin, compared to 17-24% for AD non-lesional skin and healthy control. A decreasing amount of total protein with increasing stratum corneum depth was found for all skin types. Significant differences in stratum corneum protein content between AD lesional, AD non-lesional and healthy control skin were revealed, independent of method used.

Citing Articles

Use of D-Squame as a Minimally Invasive Technique to Evaluate Skin Immune Response Biomarkers in Canine Atopic Dermatitis.

Mosca M, Milhau N, Legain M, Idee A, Langon X, Pin D Vet Sci. 2025; 12(1.

PMID: 39852879 PMC: 11769324. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci12010004.


Skin inflammatory signatures, as measured by disordered spatial redness patterns, predict current and future skin ageing attributes.

Omotezako T, Zhao W, Rodrigues M, Ehrman M, Deng D, Lau H Exp Dermatol. 2024; 33(8):e15163.

PMID: 39171635 PMC: 11605491. DOI: 10.1111/exd.15163.


Comparison of Medical Tape Performance Using Skin Response Quantitative Measurements on Healthy Volunteers.

Turnbull M, Grigsby I, Unertl K, Sokol K, Nordby T, Liu C Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e56548.

PMID: 38646282 PMC: 11027027. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56548.


Comparison between ammonium formate and ammonium fluoride in the analysis of stratum corneum lipids by reversed phase chromatography coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry.

Maiellaro M, Bottillo G, Cavallo A, Camera E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):40.

PMID: 38167931 PMC: 10762128. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50051-1.


Evaluating the Irritant Factors of Silicone and Hydrocolloid Skin Contact Adhesives Using Trans-Epidermal Water Loss, Protein Stripping, Erythema, and Ease of Removal.

Dyson E, Sikkink S, Nocita D, Twigg P, Westgate G, Swift T ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2023; 7(1):284-296.

PMID: 38150300 PMC: 10792606. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.3c00874.


References
1.
Voegeli R, Heiland J, Doppler S, Rawlings A, Schreier T . Efficient and simple quantification of stratum corneum proteins on tape strippings by infrared densitometry. Skin Res Technol. 2007; 13(3):242-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00214.x. View

2.
Benson N, Papenfuss J, Wong R, Motaal A, Tran V, Panko J . An analysis of select pathogenic messages in lesional and non-lesional psoriatic skin using non-invasive tape harvesting. J Invest Dermatol. 2006; 126(10):2234-41. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700412. View

3.
Agrawal R, Woodfolk J . Skin barrier defects in atopic dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014; 14(5):433. PMC: 4034059. DOI: 10.1007/s11882-014-0433-9. View

4.
Pinnagoda J, Tupker R, Agner T, Serup J . Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1990; 22(3):164-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1990.tb01553.x. View

5.
Jacobi U, Weigmann H, Ulrich J, Sterry W, Lademann J . Estimation of the relative stratum corneum amount removed by tape stripping. Skin Res Technol. 2005; 11(2):91-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00094.x. View