» Articles » PMID: 26816281

Helsinki Trauma Outcome Study 2005: Audit on Outcome in Trauma Management in Adult Patients in Southern Part of Finland

Overview
Date 2016 Jan 28
PMID 26816281
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The outcome performance of the adult patients trauma care in Helsinki University Hospital was compared with a sample of English hospitals. This was a first time such an audit on trauma care was conducted in Finland. Helsinki University Hospital submitted the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN, UK) data of adult trauma patients during 1 year period (from 1 September 2004 to 31 August 2005). Patients younger than 16 years were excluded. The outcome performance was assessed by TARN prediction model using the TARN database as reference. There were total of 1,717 patients in Helsinki and 16,774 patients in English hospitals fulfilling the study inclusion criteria, and 1,635 (95.2% of total) eligible patients in Helsinki and 15,269 (91.0% of total) in England were used for analysis. The patients were older and the mean ISS was higher in Helsinki (mean ISS in Helsinki 14 vs. 11 in England). The standardized W statistic (a measure of survival variation from the expected mean, per 100 patients) was + 3.0 (confidence intervals + 2.3 to + 3.8) for Helsinki University Hospital and + 0.2 (confidence intervals -0.1 to 0.4) for English hospitals. These results suggest that the organization of trauma care in Helsinki University Hospital area is more effective in preventing death after trauma in adults than that covering the present sample of English hospitals.

Citing Articles

Imaging of penetrating thoracic trauma in a large Nordic trauma center.

Nummela M, Thorisdottir S, Oladottir G, Koskinen S Acta Radiol Open. 2020; 8(12):2058460119895485.

PMID: 31903225 PMC: 6926989. DOI: 10.1177/2058460119895485.


Severe blunt trauma in Finland and Estonia: comparison of two regional trauma repositories.

Saar S, Brinck T, Laos J, Handolin L, Talving P Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019; 46(2):371-376.

PMID: 30847535 PMC: 7223228. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-01068-z.


Trauma registry comparison: six-year results in trauma care in Southern Finland and Germany.

Brinck T, Handolin L, Paffrath T, Lefering R Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015; 41(5):509-16.

PMID: 26037999 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-014-0470-z.


Trauma care in Germany: major differences in case fatality rates between centers.

Hilbert P, Lefering R, Stuttmann R Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010; 107(26):463-9.

PMID: 20644700 PMC: 2905836. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0463.


Pre-notification of arriving trauma patient at trauma centre: a retrospective analysis of the information in 700 consecutive cases.

Handolin L, Jaaskelainen J Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2008; 16:15.

PMID: 19019252 PMC: 2612016. DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-16-15.

References
1.
Bouamra O, Wrotchford A, Hollis S, Vail A, Woodford M, Lecky F . A new approach to outcome prediction in trauma: A comparison with the TRISS model. J Trauma. 2006; 61(3):701-10. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197175.91116.10. View

2.
Mackenzie E . Review of evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness resulting from panel studies. J Trauma. 1999; 47(3 Suppl):S34-41. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199909001-00008. View

3.
Peleg K, Aharonson-Daniel L, Stein M, Kluger Y, Michaelson M, Rivkind A . Increased survival among severe trauma patients: the impact of a national trauma system. Arch Surg. 2004; 139(11):1231-6. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.139.11.1231. View

4.
Champion H, Copes W, Sacco W, Lawnick M, Keast S, Bain Jr L . The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care. J Trauma. 1990; 30(11):1356-65. View

5.
Simons R, Eliopoulos V, Laflamme D, Brown D . Impact on process of trauma care delivery 1 year after the introduction of a trauma program in a provincial trauma center. J Trauma. 1999; 46(5):811-5; discussion 815-6. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199905000-00008. View