Five Years Experience of Trauma Care in a German Urban Level I University Trauma Center
Overview
Emergency Medicine
Affiliations
Background: A regionalized approach to trauma care with the implementation of designated level I trauma centers has been shown to improve survival after multiple injuries. Our study aimed to describe the current reality in an urban German level I university trauma center concerning the primary admission of patients into the emergency room.
Materials And Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all multiple trauma patients that were prospectively documented in our documentation system TraumaWatch(®) from 2003 to 2007. Documentation included physiological findings as well as diagnostic and therapeutic procedures structured as: (A) preclinical phase; (B) emergency room treatment; (C) intensive care unit; and (D) final outcome according to the German Trauma Registry.
Results: In total, 1,848 patients were completely documented and, thus, analyzed. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 16.5 ± 14.1 points and the mean ± SD age was 38.7 ± 21.9 years. An increasing number of patients received whole-body computed tomography (48.8% in 2003 vs. 83.3%in 2007, p < 0.001) and, on average, the ISS increased over the years (14.4 points in 2003 vs. 17.9 points in 2007). The overall hospital mortality was 7.1%, without significant change over time. The completionofimagingdiagnostics became significantly faster for all of the documented procedures (X-ray pelvis, X-ray chest, whole-body CT, abdominal ultrasound) (p < 0.001).
Discussion: Descriptive data on the current reality in urban level I trauma care can be derived from our study. Additionally, we achieved improved time intervals for emergency diagnostics and treatment, while hospital mortality remained constant, despite a higher injury severity. This is due to a standardized protocol which is applied during the 24-h in-house attending coverage.
Conclusion: Regionalized trauma care with designated level I trauma centers is justified by the improvement of time intervals and outcome, but adequate resources are required.
What trauma patients need: the European dilemma.
Hietbrink F, Mohseni S, Mariani D, Naess P, Rey-Valcarcel C, Biloslavo A Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022; 50(3):627-634.
PMID: 35798972 PMC: 11249462. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02014-w.
Lustenberger T, Stormann P, Eichler K, Nau C, Janko M, Marzi I Front Surg. 2021; 7:601140.
PMID: 33392246 PMC: 7773821. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.601140.
Liu T, Bai X Chin J Traumatol. 2017; 21(2):80-83.
PMID: 29246656 PMC: 5911711. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.06.004.
Wyen H, Jakob H, Wutzler S, Lefering R, Laurer H, Marzi I Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016; 36(4):300-7.
PMID: 26816034 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-010-1124-4.
Focus on: Diagnostic and prognosis of severely traumatized patients.
Trentz O, Marzi I Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016; 35(5):427-8.
PMID: 26815207 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-009-4005-y.