» Articles » PMID: 26815144

The Importance of Determining the Limit of Detection of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing Methods

Overview
Journal Prenat Diagn
Publisher Wiley
Date 2016 Jan 28
PMID 26815144
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Several non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) methods, which analyze circulating fetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma, suggest a fetal fraction (FF) ≥ 4% for a reportable result, with the assumption that fetal aneuploidies may not be detectable at lower FF. This study determined the actual limit of detection (LOD) of a massively parallel sequencing-based NIPT method and evaluated its performance in testing samples with low FF.

Method: An experimental model, involving the creation of artificial plasma mixtures with a final aneuploid FF ranging from 1% to 4%, simulated samples at different proportions of fetal cfDNA. We then analyzed 7103 blood samples, from pregnant women undergoing NIPT, to assess the impact of low FF on the performance of cfDNA testing.

Results: Detection of common aneuploidies in samples with an FF as low as 2% is well within the ability of this technology. Of 105 pregnancies confirmed chromosomally abnormal, 25 (23.8%) involving a 2% <  FF  <  4% were consistently detected. These high-risk pregnancies would have not been identified using the suggested 4% FF cut-off.

Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of determining the actual LOD for each specific NIPT methodology. It may reduce the incidence of test cancelations and shorten the time required for the diagnosis of aneuploidy. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Citing Articles

Analysis of fetal fraction in non-invasive prenatal testing with low-depth whole genome sequencing.

Xie X, Yin W, Li F, Xuan S, Ouyang Y Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41563.

PMID: 39850426 PMC: 11755048. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41563.


Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cell-free-DNA-based diagnostics.

Tsui W, Ding S, Jiang P, Lo Y Genome Res. 2025; 35(1):1-19.

PMID: 39843210 PMC: 11789496. DOI: 10.1101/gr.278413.123.


Discordant Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening vs. Diagnostic Results of Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies: Implications for Newborn Screening and Genetic Counseling.

Howell S, Davis S, Carstens B, Haag M, Ross J, Tartaglia N Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024; 10(3).

PMID: 39051404 PMC: 11270358. DOI: 10.3390/ijns10030048.


A Novel Paradigm for Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Screening: Trophoblast Retrieval and Isolation from the Cervix (TRIC).

Hong K, Park H, Jang H, Shim S, Jang Y, Kim S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(15).

PMID: 37568895 PMC: 10417081. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13152532.


Maternal and fetal factors influencing fetal fraction: A retrospective analysis of 153,306 pregnant women undergoing noninvasive prenatal screening.

Deng C, Liu J, Liu S, Liu H, Bai T, Jing X Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1066178.

PMID: 37114008 PMC: 10126334. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1066178.