» Articles » PMID: 26812875

Monoclonal Antibody Therapeutics As Potential Interferences on Protein Electrophoresis and Immunofixation

Overview
Specialties Biochemistry
Pathology
Date 2016 Jan 27
PMID 26812875
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of therapeutic recombinant monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has triggered concerns of mis-diagnosis of a plasma cell dyscrasia in treated patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if infliximab (INF), adalimumab (ADA), eculizumab (ECU), vedolizumab (VEDO), and rituximab (RITU) are detected as monoclonal proteins by serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE).

Methods: Pooled normal sera were spiked with various concentrations (ranging from trough to peak) of INF, ADA, ECU, VEDO and RITU. The peak concentration for VEDO and RITU was also added to samples with known monoclonal gammopathies. All samples were analyzed by SPEP (Helena Laboratories) and IFE (Sebia); sera containing peak concentrations of mAbs were reflexed to electrospray-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (AbSciex Triple TOF 5600) for the intact light chain monoclonal immunoglobulin rapid accurate mass measurement (miRAMM).

Results: For all mAbs tested, no quantifiable M-spikes were observed by SPEP at any concentration analyzed. Small γ fraction abnormalities were noted on SPEP for VEDO at 300 μg/mL and RITU at 400 μg/mL, with identification of small IgG κ proteins on IFE. Using miRAMM for peak samples, therapeutic mAbs light chain accurate masses were identified above the polyclonal background and were distinct from endogenous monoclonal gammopathies.

Conclusions: MAbs should not be easily confounded with plasma cell dyscrasias in patients undergoing therapy except when a SPEP and IFE are performed within a couple of days from infusion (peak). In ambiguous cases the use of the miRAMM technology could precisely identify the therapeutic mAb distinct from any endogenous monoclonal protein.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a deep learning-based protein electrophoresis classification algorithm.

Lee N, Jeong S, Jeon K, Song W, Park M PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0273284.

PMID: 36001575 PMC: 9401151. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273284.


Bringing mass spectrometry into the care of patients with multiple myeloma.

Murray D Int J Hematol. 2022; 115(6):790-798.

PMID: 35471500 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-022-03364-2.


Proteomics-inspired precision medicine for treating and understanding multiple myeloma.

Ho M, Bianchi G, Anderson K Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev. 2021; 5(2):67-85.

PMID: 34414281 PMC: 8372187. DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2020.1732205.


A Personalized Mass Spectrometry-Based Assay to Monitor M-Protein in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (EasyM).

Liyasova M, McDonald Z, Taylor P, Gorospe K, Xu X, Yao C Clin Cancer Res. 2021; 27(18):5028-5037.

PMID: 34210683 PMC: 9401514. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0649.


An unusual pattern in serum protein electrophoresis to take in mind: A case report.

Gastelum-Cano J, Fragoso-Flores J, Noffal-Nuno V, Deffis-Court M Pract Lab Med. 2021; 24:e00200.

PMID: 33490350 PMC: 7810760. DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00200.