Salient Beliefs Towards Vaginal Delivery in Pregnant Women: A Qualitative Study from Iran

Overview

Journal Reprod Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Reproductive Medicine

Date 2016 Jan 24

PMID 26801087

Citations 7

Authors

Parvin Rahnama

Khadigheh Mohammadi

Ali Montazeri

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Childbirth by cesarean section has increased at an alarming rate over the past few years in Iran. The present study was designed to explore pregnant women's beliefs about the mode of delivery in order to provide some suggestions for future interventions to increase vaginal delivery.

Methods: This was a qualitative study framed by the Theory of Planned Behavior conducted in Tehran, Iran in 2013. Pregnant women attending public hospitals were recruited. The data were collected via in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Interviews were conducted in a semi-structured manner. All interviews were tape recorded and transcribed verbatim. A content analysis approach was used to explore the data.

Results: In all 36 pregnant women participated in the study. The mean age of women was 27.8 (SD = 4.5) years. In general, women preferred vaginal delivery. During interviews and focus group discussions several themes emerged related to the pain associated with vaginal delivery, fears of childbirth, related health concerns, and the role of decision makers. The findings were grouped into three main themes namely: behavioral beliefs (negative and positive beliefs towards outcomes of vaginal delivery), normative beliefs (injunctive norms and descriptive norms), and control beliefs (internal and external barriers).

Conclusion: Despite the fact that there were positive beliefs regarding vaginal delivery, participants indicated concerns related to loss of control and fear. It is essential that health care providers realize the psychological needs of women during pregnancy and the need for continuous support during childbirth. This type of support may improve their self-control during labor, and decrease fear of childbirth.

Citing Articles

Spatial distribution and associated factors of cesarean section in Ethiopia using mini EDHS 2019 data: a community based cross-sectional study.

Azene A, Wassie G, Bihonegn Asmamaw D, Negash W, Belachew T, Terefe B Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21637.

PMID: 39284865 PMC: 11405397. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71293-7.

Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study.

Colomar M, Colistro V, Sosa C, de Francisco L, Betran A, Serruya S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):471.

PMID: 35672663 PMC: 9175367. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04792-y.

Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences.

Colomar M, Opiyo N, Kingdon C, Long Q, Nion S, Bohren M PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0251072.

PMID: 33951101 PMC: 8099111. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251072.

Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in Iran: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Shirzad M, Shakibazadeh E, Hajimiri K, Betran A, Jahanfar S, Bohren M Reprod Health. 2021; 18(1):3.

PMID: 33388072 PMC: 7778821. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-020-01047-x.

Effect of "motivational interviewing" and "information, motivation, and behavioral skills" counseling interventions on choosing the mode of delivery in pregnant women: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Shirzad M, Shakibazadeh E, Rahimi Foroushani A, Abedini M, Poursharifi H, Babaei S Trials. 2020; 21(1):970.

PMID: 33239038 PMC: 7687772. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04865-3.

References

Osis M, Padua K, Duarte G, Souza T, Faundes A . The opinion of Brazilian women regarding vaginal labor and cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001; 75 Suppl 1:S59-66. View

Hajian S, Shariati M, Najmabadi K, Yunesian M, Ajami M . Use of the extended parallel process model (EPPM) to predict Iranian women's intention for vaginal delivery. J Transcult Nurs. 2014; 26(3):234-43. DOI: 10.1177/1043659614524247. View

Lundgren I, Smith V, Nilsson C, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Nicoletti J, Devane D . Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15:16. PMC: 4324420. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0441-3. View

Barbosa G, Giffin K, Angulo-Tuesta A, Gama A, Chor D, DOrsi E . [Cesarean sections: who wants them and under what circumstances?]. Cad Saude Publica. 2004; 19(6):1611-20. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2003000600006. View

Shahoei R, Rezaei M, Ranaei F, Khosravy F, Zaheri F . Kurdish women's preference for mode of birth: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014; 20(3):302-9. DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12150. View

Noar S . A health educator's guide to theories of health behavior. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2007; 24(1):75-92. DOI: 10.2190/DALP-3F95-GCT3-M922. View

Yazdizadeh B, Nedjat S, Mohammad K, Rashidian A, Changizi N, Majdzadeh R . Cesarean section rate in Iran, multidimensional approaches for behavioral change of providers: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11:159. PMC: 3146409. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-159. View

Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V, Martin D, Easterling T . Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA. 2000; 283(18):2411-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.18.2411. View

Pang S, Leung D, Leung T, Lai C, Lau T, Chung T . Determinants of preference for elective caesarean section in Hong Kong Chinese pregnant women. Hong Kong Med J. 2007; 13(2):100-5. View

10.

TorkZahrani S . Commentary: childbirth education in iran. J Perinat Educ. 2009; 17(3):51-4. PMC: 2517184. DOI: 10.1624/105812408X329601. View

11.

Liu N, Mazzoni A, Zamberlin N, Colomar M, Chang O, Arnaud L . Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2013; 10(1):2. PMC: 3561262. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-2. View

12.

Nilsson C, Lundgren I, Smith V, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Nicoletti J, Devane D . Women-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): A systematic review. Midwifery. 2015; 31(7):657-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.003. View

13.

Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M, Asl Amin Abad R . Prevalence and Causes of Cesarean Section in Iran: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2015; 43(5):545-55. PMC: 4449402. View

14.

Gamble J, Creedy D . Women's preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors. Birth. 2001; 28(2):101-10. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00101.x. View

15.

Nilsson C, Lundgren I . Women's lived experience of fear of childbirth. Midwifery. 2007; 25(2):e1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.01.017. View

16.

Maharlouei N, Rezaianzadeh A, Hesami E, Moradi F, Mazloomi E, Joulaei H . The preference of Iranian women to have normal vaginal or cesarean deliveries. J Res Med Sci. 2014; 18(11):943-50. PMC: 3906784. View

17.

Levine E, Ghai V, Barton J, Strom C . Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97(3):439-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01150-9. View

18.

McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy D . Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth. 2007; 34(1):65-79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00147.x. View

19.

Fenwick J, Staff L, Gamble J, Creedy D, Bayes S . Why do women request caesarean section in a normal, healthy first pregnancy?. Midwifery. 2009; 26(4):394-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.10.011. View

20.

Wax J, Cartin A, Pinette M, Blackstone J . Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004; 59(8):601-16. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000133942.76239.57. View