» Articles » PMID: 26800987

Neighborhood-Level and Spatial Characteristics Associated with Lay Naloxone Reversal Events and Opioid Overdose Deaths

Overview
Journal J Urban Health
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Jan 24
PMID 26800987
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There were over 23,000 opioid overdose deaths in the USA in 2013, and opioid-related mortality is increasing. Increased access to naloxone, particularly through community-based lay naloxone distribution, is a widely supported strategy to reduce opioid overdose mortality; however, little is known about the ecological and spatial patterns of the distribution and utilization of lay naloxone. This study aims to investigate the neighborhood-level correlates and spatial relationships of lay naloxone distribution and utilization and opioid overdose deaths. We determined the locations of lay naloxone distribution sites and the number of unintentional opioid overdose deaths and reported reversal events in San Francisco census tracts (n = 195) from 2010 to 2012. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to compare census tract characteristics across tracts adjacent and not adjacent to distribution sites and multivariable negative binomial regression models to assess the association between census tract characteristics, including distance to the nearest site, and counts of opioid overdose deaths and naloxone reversal events. Three hundred forty-two opioid overdose deaths and 316 overdose reversals with valid location data were included in our analysis. Census tracts including or adjacent to a distribution site had higher income inequality, lower percentage black or African American residents, more drug arrests, higher population density, more overdose deaths, and more reversal events (all p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, greater distance to the nearest distribution site (up to a distance of 4000 m) was associated with a lower count of Naloxone reversals [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.51 per 500 m increase, 95% CI 0.39-0.67, p < 0.001] but was not significantly associated with opioid overdose deaths. These findings affirm that locating lay naloxone distribution sites in areas with high levels of substance use and overdose risk facilitates reversals of opioid overdoses in those immediate areas but suggests that alternative delivery methods may be necessary to reach individuals in other areas with less concentrated risk.

Citing Articles

Benefits and challenges of geographic information systems (GIS) for data-driven outreach in black communities experiencing overdose disparities: results of a stakeholder focus group.

Banks D, Paschke M, Ghonasgi R, Thompson V BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2103.

PMID: 39098915 PMC: 11299267. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19541-3.


Bystanders Saving Lives with Naloxone: A Scoping Review on Methods to Estimate Overdose Reversals.

Kinoshita A, Saadat S, Chakravarthy B West J Emerg Med. 2024; 25(4):500-506.

PMID: 39028236 PMC: 11254156. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.18037.


Risk factors for persistent fatal opioid-involved overdose clusters in Massachusetts 2011-2021: a spatial statistical analysis with socio-economic, accessibility, and prescription factors.

Srinivasan S, Pustz J, Marsh E, Young L, Stopka T BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1893.

PMID: 39010038 PMC: 11251103. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19399-5.


Using drugs alone in single room occupancy housing: Understanding environmental drivers of overdose risk.

Fleming T, Boyd J, Gagnon M, Kerr T, McNeil R Int J Drug Policy. 2024; 128:104444.

PMID: 38754243 PMC: 11420829. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104444.


The association between naloxone claims and proportion of independent versus chain pharmacies: A longitudinal analysis of naloxone claims in the United States.

Freibott C, Jalali A, Murphy S, Walley A, Linas B, Jeng P J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2024; 64(4):102093.

PMID: 38604474 PMC: 11402586. DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.102093.


References
1.
Rose V, Lutnick A, Kral A . Feasibility of providing interventions for injection drug users in pharmacy settings: a case study among San Francisco pharmacists. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014; 46(3):226-32. PMC: 4112371. DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2014.921745. View

2.
Strang J, Manning V, Mayet S, Best D, Titherington E, Santana L . Overdose training and take-home naloxone for opiate users: prospective cohort study of impact on knowledge and attitudes and subsequent management of overdoses. Addiction. 2008; 103(10):1648-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02314.x. View

3.
Heimer R, Barbour R, Shaboltas A, Hoffman I, Kozlov A . Spatial distribution of HIV prevalence and incidence among injection drugs users in St Petersburg: implications for HIV transmission. AIDS. 2007; 22(1):123-30. PMC: 2778790. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f244ef. View

4.
Fulcher C, Kaukinen C . Mapping and visualizing the location HIV service providers: an exploratory spatial analysis of Toronto neighborhoods. AIDS Care. 2005; 17(3):386-96. DOI: 10.1080/09540120512331314312. View

5.
Kaukinen C, Fulcher C . Mapping the social demography and location of HIV services across Toronto neighbourhoods. Health Soc Care Community. 2005; 14(1):37-48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00595.x. View