» Articles » PMID: 26794920

Trials, Regulation and Tribulations

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2016 Jan 23
PMID 26794920
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Regulation EU 536/2014 EU introduces a separation between two parts (technical-scientific aspects and locally relevant ethical aspects) in the assessment of applications for approval of trials and provides for each 'Member State concerned' to arrive at 'one single decision' regarding the application for authorisation to conduct a trial.

Proposals: The Regulation should be implemented in such a way as to avoid a separation between scientific assessment and ethical assessment; guarantee the absence of conflicts of interest in the institutions responsible for decision-making; promote efficiency on the part of ethics committees. In particular, (i) it is not appropriate to assess Parts I and II of the application for approval to conduct a trial separately (scientific soundness is the principal requisite for ethical soundness); (ii) conflicts of interest should be avoided, especially as regards links with the national authority responsible for drugs regulation; (iii) decision-making in each state should be the responsibility of a single coordinating ethics committee divided into sections specialising in different therapeutic fields; (iv) local committees affiliated to institutions where trial participants are recruited should be able to interact with the coordinating committee, provide consultation services-including on issues of clinical ethics-and promote training in the field of biomedical ethics.

Citing Articles

Rethinking the role of Research Ethics Committees in the light of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 on clinical trials and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Tusino S, Furfaro M Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021; 88(1):40-46.

PMID: 33891323 PMC: 8251080. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14871.


Application challenges of the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation.

Gefenas E, cekanauskaite A, Lekstutiene J, Lukaseviciene V Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017; 73(7):795-798.

PMID: 28567502 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-017-2267-6.

References
1.
Emanuel E, Wendler D, Grady C . What makes clinical research ethical?. JAMA. 2000; 283(20):2701-11. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.20.2701. View

2.
Larcher V, Slowther A, Watson A . Core competencies for clinical ethics committees. Clin Med (Lond). 2010; 10(1):30-3. PMC: 4954474. DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-1-30. View

3.
. Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 1996). Council of.... Hum Reprod. 1997; 12(9):2076-80. View