» Articles » PMID: 26792536

Computational Crystallization

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Biochemistry
Biophysics
Date 2016 Jan 22
PMID 26792536
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Crystallization is a key step in macromolecular structure determination by crystallography. While a robust theoretical treatment of the process is available, due to the complexity of the system, the experimental process is still largely one of trial and error. In this article, efforts in the field are discussed together with a theoretical underpinning using a solubility phase diagram. Prior knowledge has been used to develop tools that computationally predict the crystallization outcome and define mutational approaches that enhance the likelihood of crystallization. For the most part these tools are based on binary outcomes (crystal or no crystal), and the full information contained in an assembly of crystallization screening experiments is lost. The potential of this additional information is illustrated by examples where new biological knowledge can be obtained and where a target can be sub-categorized to predict which class of reagents provides the crystallization driving force. Computational analysis of crystallization requires complete and correctly formatted data. While massive crystallization screening efforts are under way, the data available from many of these studies are sparse. The potential for this data and the steps needed to realize this potential are discussed.

Citing Articles

20 years of crystal hits: progress and promise in ultrahigh-throughput crystallization screening.

Lynch M, Snell M, Potter S, Snell E, Bowman S Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2023; 79(Pt 3):198-205.

PMID: 36876429 PMC: 9986797. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798323001274.


Classification of crystallization outcomes using deep convolutional neural networks.

Bruno A, Charbonneau P, Newman J, Snell E, So D, Vanhoucke V PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0198883.

PMID: 29924841 PMC: 6010233. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198883.


What macromolecular crystallogenesis tells us - what is needed in the future.

Giege R IUCrJ. 2017; 4(Pt 4):340-349.

PMID: 28875021 PMC: 5571797. DOI: 10.1107/S2052252517006595.

References
1.
Petrauskas V, Maximowitsch E, Matulis D . Thermodynamics of Ion Pair Formations Between Charged Poly(Amino Acid)s. J Phys Chem B. 2015; 119(37):12164-71. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05767. View

2.
Snell E, Nagel R, Wojtaszcyk A, ONeill H, Wolfley J, Luft J . The application and use of chemical space mapping to interpret crystallization screening results. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2008; 64(Pt 12):1240-9. PMC: 2631111. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444908032411. View

3.
Fazio V, Peat T, Newman J . A drunken search in crystallization space. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun. 2014; 70(Pt 10):1303-11. PMC: 4188070. DOI: 10.1107/S2053230X1401841X. View

4.
Goldschmidt L, Cooper D, Derewenda Z, Eisenberg D . Toward rational protein crystallization: A Web server for the design of crystallizable protein variants. Protein Sci. 2007; 16(8):1569-76. PMC: 2203352. DOI: 10.1110/ps.072914007. View

5.
Charoenkwan P, Shoombuatong W, Lee H, Chaijaruwanich J, Huang H, Ho S . SCMCRYS: predicting protein crystallization using an ensemble scoring card method with estimating propensity scores of P-collocated amino acid pairs. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9):e72368. PMC: 3760885. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072368. View