Core Outcome Sets and Systematic Reviews

Overview

Journal Syst Rev

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2016 Jan 22

PMID 26792080

Citations 85

Authors

Mike Clarke

Paula R Williamson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Systematic reviews seek to bring together research evidence to answer the question for the review. The reviewers usually wish to compare, contrast and, if appropriate, combine the findings of the existing research studies. However, these intentions are often thwarted by inconsistencies in the outcomes that were measured and reported in the individual studies. This, in turn, makes it difficult for readers of the review to use it to make informed decisions and choices about health and social care. One solution is for trials in a particular topic area to measure and report a standardised set of outcomes, which would then be used in the review. Core outcome sets are a means of doing this, providing an agreed standardised collection of outcomes for measuring and reporting for a specific area of health. In this commentary, we argue for greater involvement of systematic reviewers in the development and implementation of core outcome sets. This might help with, for example, the selection of outcomes to include in the Summary of findings tables that provide users of the review with the key quantitative findings. Consideration of core outcome sets when reviewers register their topics with Cochrane Review Groups or in PROSPERO would also help reviewers to plan their reviews. A greater uptake of core outcome sets across research, including systematic reviews, would help towards the ultimate aim of improving health and well-being through improving health and social care.

Citing Articles

Use, knowledge, & attitudes on core outcome sets among trialists & systematic reviewers in India: A survey.

Bhaumik S, Sharma I, Tyagi J, Ingale S Indian J Med Res. 2025; 160(6):606-613.

PMID: 39913520 PMC: 11801768. DOI: 10.25259/IJMR_758_2024.

Assessing the uptake of infertility core outcome set in IVF randomized controlled trials.

Li W, Jia N, Chi H, Zhan S, Zeng L Hum Reprod. 2024; 40(1):85-95.

PMID: 39673431 PMC: 11700894. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae255.

Core outcome set for studies evaluating interventions to prevent or treat delirium in long-term care older residents: international key stakeholder informed consensus study.

Russell G, Rana N, Reilly S, Shehadeh A, Page V, Siddiqi N Age Ageing. 2024; 53(10).

PMID: 39396912 PMC: 11471312. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae227.

Effects and safety of preparation in the adjuvant treatment for dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liu M, Cui C, Chang T, Zhou Q, Cui Y, Zhang S Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1360997.

PMID: 39101133 PMC: 11294943. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1360997.

Outcomes reported in randomised trials of surgical prehabilitation: a scoping review.

Fleurent-Gregoire C, Burgess N, Denehy L, Edbrooke L, Engel D, Testa G Br J Anaesth. 2024; 133(1):42-57.

PMID: 38570300 PMC: 11213997. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.01.046.

References

Glasziou P, Altman D, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S . Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014; 383(9913):267-76. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X. View

Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G . GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64(4):395-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012. View

Clarke M, Williamson P . Core outcome sets and trial registries. Trials. 2015; 16:216. PMC: 4446826. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0738-6. View

Kirkham J, Gorst S, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Devane D . COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol). Trials. 2015; 16:373. PMC: 4546355. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0913-9. View

Han S, Crowther C, Middleton P, Heatley E . Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (3):CD009275. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009275.pub2. View

Page M, McKenzie J, Kirkham J, Dwan K, Kramer S, Green S . Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (10):MR000035. PMC: 8191366. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2. View

Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M . Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e99111. PMC: 4059640. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099111. View

Rosenbaum S, Glenton C, Oxman A . Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(6):620-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014. View

Gargon E, Williamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M . The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013. Trials. 2014; 15:279. PMC: 4107994. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-279. View

10.

Smith V, Clarke M, Williamson P, Gargon E . Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 68(3):237-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.022. View

11.

Adams C, Polzmacher S, Wolff A . Systematic reviews: work that needs to be done and not to be done. J Evid Based Med. 2013; 6(4):232-5. DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12072. View

12.

Booth A, Clarke M, Dooley G, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M . PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility. Syst Rev. 2013; 2:4. PMC: 3563608. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-4. View

13.

Kirkham J, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, Williamson P . Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years. Trials. 2013; 14:324. PMC: 3852710. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-324. View

14.

Wuytack F, Smith V, Clarke M, Williamson P, Gargon E . Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev. 2015; 4:73. PMC: 4489040. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0060-0. View

15.

Miller A, Hoogstraten B, STAQUET M, Winkler A . Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer. 1981; 47(1):207-14. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<207::aid-cncr2820470134>3.0.co;2-6. View

16.

Clarke M . Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews. Trials. 2007; 8:39. PMC: 2169261. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-39. View

17.

Prinsen C, Vohra S, Rose M, King-Jones S, Ishaque S, Bhaloo Z . Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a 'core outcome set'. Trials. 2014; 15:247. PMC: 4082295. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-247. View

18.

Kirkham J, Gargon E, Clarke M, Williamson P . Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?--a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane Review Groups. Trials. 2013; 14:21. PMC: 3575292. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-21. View

19.

Gargon E, Williamson P, Clarke M . Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15:26. PMC: 4395975. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-015-0019-9. View