» Articles » PMID: 26784127

Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities

Overview
Date 2016 Jan 20
PMID 26784127
Citations 229
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides information unattainable by intermittent capillary blood glucose, including instantaneous real-time display of glucose level and rate of change of glucose, alerts and alarms for actual or impending hypo- and hyperglycemia, "24/7" coverage, and the ability to characterize glycemic variability. Progressively more accurate and precise, reasonably unobtrusive, small, comfortable, user-friendly devices connect to the Internet to share information and are sine qua non for a closed-loop artificial pancreas. CGM can inform, educate, motivate, and alert people with diabetes. CGM is medically indicated for patients with frequent, severe, or nocturnal hypoglycemia, especially in the presence of hypoglycemia unawareness. Surprisingly, despite tremendous advances, utilization of CGM has remained fairly limited to date. Barriers to use have included the following: (1) lack of Food and Drug Administration approval, to date, for insulin dosing ("nonadjuvant use") in the United States and for use in hospital and intensive care unit settings; (2) cost and variable reimbursement; (3) need for recalibrations; (4) periodic replacement of sensors; (5) day-to-day variability in glycemic patterns, which can limit the predictability of findings based on retrospective, masked "professional" use; (6) time, implicit costs, and inconvenience for uploading of data for retrospective analysis; (7) lack of fair and reasonable reimbursement for physician time; (8) inexperience and lack of training of physicians and other healthcare professionals regarding interpretation of CGM results; (9) lack of standardization of software methods for analysis of CGM data; and (10) need for professional medical organizations to develop and disseminate additional clinical practice guidelines regarding the role of CGM. Ongoing advances in technology and clinical research have addressed several of these barriers. Use of CGM in conjunction with an insulin pump with automated suspension of insulin infusion in response to actual observed or predicted hypoglycemia, as well as progressive refinement of closed-loop systems, is expected to dramatically enhance the clinical utility and utilization of CGM.

Citing Articles

Feedback control over plasma drug concentrations achieves rapid and accurate control over solid-tissue drug concentrations.

Emmons N, Duman Z, Erdal M, Kippin T, Hespanha J, Plaxco K Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39975897 PMC: 11838736. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5868915/v1.


IoT-enabled biosensors for real-time monitoring and early detection of chronic diseases.

Hosain M, Kwak Y, Lee J, Choi H, Park J, Kim J Phys Act Nutr. 2025; 28(4):60-69.

PMID: 39934631 PMC: 11811615. DOI: 10.20463/pan.2024.0033.


The Era of Preemptive Medicine: Developing Medical Digital Twins through Omics, IoT, and AI Integration.

Ooka T JMA J. 2025; 8(1):1-10.

PMID: 39926086 PMC: 11799569. DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0213.


Addition of continuous glucose monitoring to glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus - An economic evaluation.

Wright E, Miller E, Bindal A, Poon Y J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025; 31(2):127-136.

PMID: 39823185 PMC: 11852799. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.24253.


Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Comorbid Dementia and Diabetes: The Evidence So Far.

Ergin B, Gadsby-Davis K, Mattishent K, Dhatariya K, Garner N, Hornberger M J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; :19322968241301058.

PMID: 39691964 PMC: 11653377. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241301058.


References
1.
. Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in a clinical care environment: evidence from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring (JDRF-CGM) trial. Diabetes Care. 2009; 33(1):17-22. PMC: 2797966. DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1502. View

2.
Blevins T, Bode B, Garg S, Grunberger G, Hirsch I, Jovanovic L . Statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Consensus Panel on continuous glucose monitoring. Endocr Pract. 2011; 16(5):730-45. DOI: 10.4158/EP.16.5.730. View

3.
Vigersky R . Escaping the Hemoglobin A1c-Centric World in Evaluating Diabetes Mellitus Interventions. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015; 9(5):1148-51. PMC: 4667353. DOI: 10.1177/1932296815576363. View

4.
Garber A, Abrahamson M, Barzilay J, Blonde L, Bloomgarden Z, Bush M . CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM--2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Endocr Pract. 2015; 21(12):1403-14. DOI: 10.4158/EP151063.CS. View

5.
Luijf Y, Mader J, Doll W, Pieber T, Farret A, Place J . Accuracy and reliability of continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to-head comparison. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013; 15(8):722-7. PMC: 3746288. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2013.0049. View