» Articles » PMID: 26781234

Evaluation of Chest CT Scan in Low-weight Children with Ultralow Tube Voltage (70 kVp) Combined with Flash Scan Technique

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Jan 20
PMID 26781234
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess radiation dose and image quality of chest CT examinations in low-weight children acquired at ultralow tube voltage (70 kVp) combined with Flash scan technique.

Materials And Methods: 30 consecutive paediatric patients (weight <20 kg) required non-contrast chest CT at 70 kVp with Flash scan mode (Group A). 30 patients for paediatric standard 80-kVp protocols with conventional spiral mode (Group B) were selected from the picture archiving and communication system. For each examination, the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP), and the effective dose (adapted as 16-cm phantom) (ED16cm) were estimated. The image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), overall subjective image quality and respiratory motion artefacts were evaluated.

Results: For radiation dose, CTDIvol (mGy), DLP (mGy cm) and ED16cm (mSv) of Group A were significantly lower than those of Group B [CTDIvol: 0.48 ± 0.003 mGy (Group A) vs 0.80 ± 0.005 mGy (Group B); p<0.001 DLP: 10.23 ± 1.35 mGy cm (Group A) vs 15.6 ± 2.02 mGy cm (Group B); p<0.001 ED16cm: 0.61 ± 0.91 mSv (Group A) vs 0.89 ± 0.13 mSv (Group B); p<0.001]. The mean image noise with Group A increased 28.5% (p = 0.002), and the mean SNR decreased 14.8% compared with Group B (p = 0.193). There was no statistical difference in overall subjective image quality grades, and Group A had significantly lower respiratory motion artefact grades than Group B (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Ultralow tube voltage (70 kVp) combined with the Flash scan technique of the chest can obtain images with clinically acceptable image noise and minimum respiratory motion artefacts in low-weight children, whilst reducing radiation dose significantly.

Advances In Knowledge: The feasibility of chest CT scan in low-weight children with ultralow tube voltage (70 kVp) combined with Flash scan technique has firstly been evaluated in our study.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of the air-gap method for reducing radiation dose in neonate CT examinations.

Masuda T, Funama Y, Nakaura T, Sato T, Oku T, Ono A Radiol Phys Technol. 2024; 18(1):293-299.

PMID: 39499357 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00855-1.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Pulmonary Vascularity in Preterm Infants with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Mukthapuram S, Donaher A, Higano N, Rowe J, Tkach J, Woods J Neonatology. 2024; 122(1):76-83.

PMID: 39074457 PMC: 11775235. DOI: 10.1159/000539545.


Outpatient Respiratory Management of Infants, Children, and Adolescents with Post-Prematurity Respiratory Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Cristea A, Ren C, Amin R, Eldredge L, Levin J, Majmudar P Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021; 204(12):e115-e133.

PMID: 34908518 PMC: 8865713. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202110-2269ST.


Reducing the radiation dose of pediatric paranasal sinus CT using an ultralow tube voltage (70 kVp) combined with iterative reconstruction: Feasibility and image quality.

Chi J, Xu D, Yin S, Li M, Shen L, Ding N Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(34):e21886.

PMID: 32846848 PMC: 7447483. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021886.


Chest CT screening in patients with overweight or obesity using spectral shaping at 150 kVp: compared with 120 kVp protocol and spectral shaping at 100 kVp protocol.

Li J, Mai Z, Zhang Z, Cui J, Yang M, Ma X Jpn J Radiol. 2020; 38(5):451-457.

PMID: 32048134 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-020-00925-5.


References
1.
Singh S, Kalra M, Gilman M, Hsieh J, Pien H, Digumarthy S . Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology. 2011; 259(2):565-73. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101450. View

2.
Lucaya J, Piqueras J, Garcia-Pena P, Enriquez G, Sotil J . Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 175(4):985-92. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.4.1750985. View

3.
Wall B, Hart D . Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. Br J Radiol. 1997; 70(833):437-9. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.70.833.9227222. View

4.
Singh S, Kalra M, Moore M, Shailam R, Liu B, Toth T . Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology. 2009; 252(1):200-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2521081554. View

5.
Huda W, Atherton J, Ware D, Cumming W . An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. Radiology. 1997; 203(2):417-22. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114097. View