» Articles » PMID: 26780055

Cytotoxic Activity of Selenosulfate Versus Selenite in Tumor Cells Depends on Cell Line and Presence of Amino Acids

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Jan 19
PMID 26780055
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Based on acute cytotoxicity studies, selenosulfate (SeSO3 (-)) has been suggested to possess a generally higher toxic activity in tumor cells than selenite. The reason for this difference in cytotoxic activity remained unclear. In the present study, cytotoxicity tests with human hepatoma (HepG2), malignant melanoma (A375), and urinary bladder carcinoma cells (T24) showed that the selenosulfate toxicity was very similar between all three tested cell lines (IC50 6.6-7.1 μM after 24 h). It was largely independent of exposure time and presence or absence of amino acids. What changed, however, was the toxicity of selenite, which was lower than that of selenosulfate only for HepG2 cells (IC50 > 15 μM), but similar to and higher than that of selenosulfate for A375 (IC50 4.7 μM) and T24 cells (IC50 3.5 μM), respectively. Addition of amino acids to T24 cell growth medium downregulated short-term selenite uptake (1.5 versus 12.9 ng Se/10(6) cells) and decreased its cytotoxicity (IC50 8.4 μM), rendering it less toxic than selenosulfate. The suggested mechanism is a stronger expression of the xc (-) transport system in the more sensitive T24 compared to HepG2 cells which creates a reductive extracellular microenvironment and facilitates selenite uptake by reduction. Selenosulfate is already reduced and so less affected. The cytotoxic activity of selenosulfate and selenite to tumor cells therefore depends on the sensitivity of each cell line, supplements like amino acids as well as the reductive state of the extracellular environment.

Citing Articles

Selenium-enriched plant foods: Selenium accumulation, speciation, and health functionality.

Tangjaidee P, Swedlund P, Xiang J, Yin H, Quek S Front Nutr. 2023; 9:962312.

PMID: 36815133 PMC: 9939470. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.962312.


Band 3/anion exchanger 1/solute carrier family 4 member 1 expression as determinant of cellular sensitivity to selenite exposure.

Fukumoto Y, Matsuhashi K, Tanaka Y, Suzuki N, Ogra Y Biochem Biophys Rep. 2022; 29:101223.

PMID: 35146136 PMC: 8818919. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2022.101223.


Selenium Species: Current Status and Potentials in Cancer Prevention and Therapy.

Tan H, Mo H, Lau A, Xu Y Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 20(1).

PMID: 30585189 PMC: 6337524. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20010075.

References
1.
Baldew G, Van den Hamer C, Los G, Vermeulen N, De Goeij J, McVie J . Selenium-induced protection against cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) nephrotoxicity in mice and rats. Cancer Res. 1989; 49(11):3020-3. View

2.
Hogberg J, Kristoferson A . Inhibition of amino acid uptake in isolated hepatocytes by selenite. FEBS Lett. 1979; 107(1):77-80. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)80467-6. View

3.
Brinkman M, Buntinx F, Muls E, Zeegers M . Use of selenium in chemoprevention of bladder cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7(9):766-74. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70862-2. View

4.
Chen T, Wong Y, Zheng W, Bai Y, Huang L . Selenium nanoparticles fabricated in Undaria pinnatifida polysaccharide solutions induce mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in A375 human melanoma cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2008; 67(1):26-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.07.010. View

5.
Camargo S, Francescato H, Lavrador M, Bianchi M . Oral administration of sodium selenite minimizes cisplatin toxicity on proximal tubules of rats. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2002; 83(3):251-62. DOI: 10.1385/BTER:83:3:251. View