» Articles » PMID: 26778757

Pulling Together: Tissue-generated Forces That Drive Lumen Morphogenesis

Overview
Date 2016 Jan 19
PMID 26778757
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mechanical interactions are essential for bending and shaping tissues during morphogenesis. A common feature of nearly all internal organs is the formation of a tubular network consisting of an epithelium that surrounds a central lumen. Lumen formation during organogenesis requires precisely coordinated mechanical and biochemical interactions. Whereas many genetic regulators of lumen formation have been identified, relatively little is known about the mechanical cues that drive lumen morphogenesis. Lumens can be shaped by a variety of physical behaviors including wrapping a sheet of cells around a hollow core, rearranging cells to expose a lumenal cavity, or elongating a tube via cell migration, though many of the details underlying these movements remain poorly understood. It is essential to define how forces generated by individual cells cooperate to produce the tissue-level forces that drive organogenesis. Transduction of mechanical forces relies on several conserved processes including the contraction of cytoskeletal networks or expansion of lumens through increased fluid pressure. The morphogenetic events that drive lumen formation serve as a model for similar mechanical processes occurring throughout development. To understand how lumenal networks arise, it will be essential to investigate how biochemical and mechanical processes integrate to generate complex structures from comparatively simple interactions.

Citing Articles

Human epicardial organoids from pluripotent stem cells resemble fetal stage with potential cardiomyocyte- transdifferentiation.

Wang F, Zou X, Zheng H, Kong T, Pei D Cell Biosci. 2025; 15(1):4.

PMID: 39825425 PMC: 11740338. DOI: 10.1186/s13578-024-01339-w.


Coexisting mechanisms of luminogenesis in pancreatic cancer-derived organoids.

Randriamanantsoa S, Raich M, Saur D, Reichert M, Bausch A iScience. 2024; 27(7):110299.

PMID: 39055943 PMC: 11269295. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110299.


The maternal embrace: the protection of plant embryos.

Woudenberg S, Hadid F, Weijers D, Borassi C J Exp Bot. 2024; 75(14):4210-4218.

PMID: 38400751 PMC: 11263485. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erae071.


In situ quantification of osmotic pressure within living embryonic tissues.

Vian A, Pochitaloff M, Yen S, Kim S, Pollock J, Liu Y Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):7023.

PMID: 37919265 PMC: 10622550. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42024-9.


Topological morphogenesis of neuroepithelial organoids.

Ishihara K, Mukherjee A, Gromberg E, Brugues J, Tanaka E, Julicher F Nat Phys. 2023; 19(2):177-183.

PMID: 36815964 PMC: 9928582. DOI: 10.1038/s41567-022-01822-6.


References
1.
Foty R, Steinberg M . The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation. Dev Biol. 2005; 278(1):255-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.012. View

2.
Nishimura T, Takeichi M . Shroom3-mediated recruitment of Rho kinases to the apical cell junctions regulates epithelial and neuroepithelial planar remodeling. Development. 2008; 135(8):1493-502. DOI: 10.1242/dev.019646. View

3.
Gjorevski N, Piotrowski A, Varner V, Nelson C . Dynamic tensile forces drive collective cell migration through three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:11458. PMC: 4499882. DOI: 10.1038/srep11458. View

4.
Steinberg M, Gilbert S . Townes and Holtfreter (1955): directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells. J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol. 2004; 301(9):701-6. DOI: 10.1002/jez.a.114. View

5.
Nelson K, Khan Z, Molnar I, Mihaly J, Kaschube M, Beitel G . Drosophila Src regulates anisotropic apical surface growth to control epithelial tube size. Nat Cell Biol. 2012; 14(5):518-25. PMC: 3343215. DOI: 10.1038/ncb2467. View