» Articles » PMID: 26775930

Is It Worth Screening for Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus Faecium Colonization?: Financial Burden of Screening in a Developing Country

Overview
Date 2016 Jan 19
PMID 26775930
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The screening of critically ill patients at high risk of vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) colonization, to detect and isolate colonized patients, is recommended to prevent and control the transmission of VRE. Screening asymptomatic carriers brings financial burden for institutions. In this study, we performed risk analysis for VRE colonization and determined the financial burden of screening in a middle-income country, Turkey.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the VRE surveillance data from a pediatric hospital between 2010 and 2014. A case-control study was conducted to identify the risk factors of colonization. Total cost of VRE screening and additional costs for a VRE colonized patient (including active surveillance cultures and contact isolation) were calculated.

Results: During the 4-year period, 6,372 patients were screened for perirectal VRE colonization. The rate of culture-positive specimens among all patients screened was 239 (3.75%). The rate of VRE infection was 0.04% (n = 3) among all patients screened. Length of hospital stay, malignancy, and being transferred from another institution were independently associated risk factors for colonization. Annual estimated costs for the laboratory were projected as $19,074 (76,295/4) for all patients screened. Cost of contact isolation for each patient colonized in a ward and an intensive care unit was $270 and $718, respectively.

Conclusions: In developing countries, institutions should identify their own high-risk patients; screening priorities should be based on prevalence of infection and hospital financial resources.

Citing Articles

Cessation of Rectal Screening for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital from Türkiye.

Dizman G, Metan G, Zarakolu P, Tanriverdi E, Hazirolan G, Aytac Ak H Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(19).

PMID: 37830678 PMC: 10572918. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11192641.


Should Perirectal Swab Culture Be Performed in Cases Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit? Lessons Learned from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Orman A, Celik Y, Evik G, Ersoz G, Kuyucu N, Ozgokce Ozmen B Children (Basel). 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36832316 PMC: 9955287. DOI: 10.3390/children10020187.


Distinguishing Clinical Strains and Resistance to Vancomycin Using a Simple In-House Screening Test.

Saenhom N, Boueroy P, Chopjitt P, Hatrongjit R, Kerdsin A Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(3).

PMID: 35326750 PMC: 8944677. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11030286.


Molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant clinical isolates in a tertiary care hospital in southern Thailand: a retrospective study.

Saengsuwan P, Singkhamanan K, Madla S, Ingviya N, Romyasamit C PeerJ. 2021; 9:e11478.

PMID: 34055492 PMC: 8141282. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11478.


Evaluation of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry assisted, selective broth method to screen for vancomycin-resistant enterococci in patients at high risk.

Huang T, Shin-Jung Lee S, Lee C, Chen C, Chen F, Chen B PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0179455.

PMID: 28609453 PMC: 5469485. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179455.