» Articles » PMID: 26772736

PANasta Trial; Cattell Warren Versus Blumgart Techniques of Panreatico-jejunostomy Following Pancreato-duodenectomy: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Jan 17
PMID 26772736
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Failure of the pancreatic remnant anastomosis to heal following pancreato-duodenectomy is a major cause of significant and life-threatening complications, notably a post-operative pancreatic fistula. Recently, non-randomized trials have shown superiority of a most intuitive anastomosis (Blumgart technique), which involves both a duct-to-mucosa and a full-thickness pancreatic "U" stitch, in effect a mattress stitch, over a standard duct-mucosa technique (Cattell-Warren). The aim of this study is to examine if these findings remain within a randomized setting.

Methods/design: The PANasta trial is a randomized, double-blinded multi-center study, whose primary aim is to assess whether a Blumgart pancreatic anastomosis (trial intervention) is superior to a Cattell-Warren pancreatic anastomosis (control intervention), in terms of pancreatic fistula rates. Patients with suspected malignancy of the pancreatic head, in whom a pancreato-duodenectomy is recommended, would be recruited from several UK specialist regional centers. The hypothesis to be tested is that a Blumgart anastomosis will reduce fistula rate from 20 to 10 %. Subjects will be stratified by research site, pancreatic consistency and diameter of pancreatic duct; giving a sample size of 253 per group. The primary outcome measure is fistula rate at the pancreatico-jejunostomy. Secondary outcome measures are: entry into adjuvant therapy, mortality, surgical complications, non-surgical complications, hospital stay, cancer-specific quality of life and health economic assessments. Enrolled patients will undergo pancreatic resection and be randomized immediately prior to pancreatic reconstruction. The operation note will only record "anastomosis constructed as per PANasta trial randomization," thus the other members of the trial team and patient are blinded. An inbuilt internal pilot study will assess the ability to randomize patients, while the construction of an operative manual and review of operative photographs will maintain standardization of techniques.

Discussion: The PANasta trial will be the first multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two types of duct-to-mucosa pancreatic anastomosis with surgical quality assurance.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN52263879 . Date of registration 15 January 2015.

Citing Articles

Pancreatic surgery outcomes: multicentre prospective snapshot study in 67 countries.

Br J Surg. 2024; 111(1).

PMID: 38743040 PMC: 10771125. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad330.


A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Clinical Trial Comparing Cattell-Warren and Blumgart Anastomoses Following Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy: PANasta Trial.

Halloran C, Neoptolemos J, Jackson R, Platt K, Psarelli E, Reddy S Ann Surg Open. 2022; 3(3):e198.

PMID: 36199490 PMC: 9508971. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000198.


Double purse-string telescoped pancreaticogastrostomy is not superior in preventing pancreatic fistula development in high-risk anastomosis: a 6-year single-center case-control study.

Garnier J, Ewald J, Marchese U, Palen A, Mokart D, Piana G Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021; 407(3):1073-1081.

PMID: 34782930 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02376-6.


Is primary total pancreatectomy in patients with high-risk pancreatic remnant justified and preferable to pancreaticoduodenectomy? -a matched-pairs analysis of 200 patients.

Luu A, Olchanetski B, Herzog T, Tannapfel A, Uhl W, Belyaev O Gland Surg. 2021; 10(2):618-628.

PMID: 33708545 PMC: 7944076. DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-670.


The modified Blumgart anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective single center cohort study.

Kalev G, Marquardt C, Matzke H, Matovu P, Schiedeck T Innov Surg Sci. 2021; 5(3-4):20200021.

PMID: 33506098 PMC: 7790181. DOI: 10.1515/iss-2020-0021.


References
1.
Halloran C, Ghaneh P, Bosonnet L, Hartley M, Sutton R, Neoptolemos J . Complications of pancreatic cancer resection. Dig Surg. 2002; 19(2):138-46. DOI: 10.1159/000052029. View

2.
Tran K, van Eijck C, Di Carlo V, Hop W, Zerbi A, Balzano G . Occlusion of the pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2002; 236(4):422-8; discussion 428. PMC: 1422596. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00004. View

3.
Mishra P, Saluja S, Gupta M, Rajalingam R, Pattnaik P . Blumgart's technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: an appraisal. Dig Surg. 2011; 28(4):281-7. DOI: 10.1159/000329584. View

4.
WHIPPLE A . Observations on radical surgery for lesions of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 2010; 82:623-31. View

5.
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz K, Montori V, Gotzsche P, Devereaux P . CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(8):e1-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004. View