» Articles » PMID: 26771292

Effects of Temperature and Trophic State on Degradation of Environmental DNA in Lake Water

Overview
Date 2016 Jan 16
PMID 26771292
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Degradation of environmental DNA (eDNA) in aquatic habitats can affect the interpretation of eDNA data and the ability to detect aquatic organisms. The effect of temperature and trophic state on the decay of Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) eDNA was evaluated using lake water microcosms and quantitative PCR for a Common Carp-specific genetic marker in two experiments. The first experiment tested the effect of temperature on Common Carp eDNA decay. Common Carp eDNA exhibited exponential decay that increased with temperature. The slowest decay rate was observed at 5 °C, with a T90 value (time to 90% reduction from initial concentration) of 6.6 days, as opposed to ∼1 day at higher temperatures. In a second experiment, decay was compared across waters from lakes of different trophic states. In this experiment, Common Carp eDNA exhibited biphasic exponential decay, characterized by rapid decay for 3-8 days followed by slow decay. Decay rate was slowest in dystrophic water and fastest in oligotrophic water, and decay rate was negatively correlated to dissolved organic carbon concentration. The overall rapid decay of eDNA and the effects of temperature and water quality should be considered in protocols for water sample storage and field sampling design.

Citing Articles

Navigating uncertainty in environmental DNA detection of a nuisance marine macroalga.

Nichols P, Fraiola K, Sherwood A, Hauk B, Lopes Jr K, Davis C PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318414.

PMID: 39903716 PMC: 11793909. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318414.


Comparison Between Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Traditional Survey Method to Identify Community Composition and Assembly of Stream Fish.

Liu Z, Hu C, You W, Li S, Wu Y, Liang Y Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(11):e70627.

PMID: 39588347 PMC: 11588354. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70627.


Environmental DNA concentrations vary greatly across productive and degradative conditions, with implications for the precision of population estimates.

Parsley M, Crespi E, Rittenhouse T, Brunner J, Goldberg C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17392.

PMID: 39075085 PMC: 11286860. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66732-4.


Evaluating eDNA and eRNA metabarcoding for aquatic biodiversity assessment: From bacteria to vertebrates.

Zhang Y, Qiu Y, Liu K, Zhong W, Yang J, Altermatt F Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2024; 21:100441.

PMID: 39027464 PMC: 11254946. DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2024.100441.


In silico assessment of 18S rDNA metabarcoding markers for the characterization of nematode communities.

Ficetola G, Guerrieri A, Cantera I, Bonin A PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0298905.

PMID: 38578734 PMC: 10997105. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298905.