» Articles » PMID: 26771011

Positive, Neutral, and Negative Connotations Associated with Social Representation of 'Hearing Loss' and 'Hearing Aids'

Overview
Journal J Audiol Otol
Date 2016 Jan 16
PMID 26771011
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: In our previous studies we explored the social representation of hearing loss and hearing aids. In this study we aimed at exploring if the positive, neutral and negative connotations associated with the social representation of 'hearing loss' and 'hearing aids' for the same categories vary across countries. In addition, we also looked at if there is an association between connotations and demographic variables.

Subjects And Methods: A total of 404 individuals from four countries were asked to indicate the words and phrases that comes to mind when they think about 'hearing loss' and 'hearing aids'. They also indicated if the words and phrases they reported had positive, neutral or negative association, which were analyzed and reported in this paper.

Results: There are considerable differences among the countries in terms of positive, neutral and negative associations report for each category in relation to hearing loss and hearing aids. However, there is limited connection between demographic variables and connotations reported in different countries.

Conclusions: These results suggesting that the social representation about the phenomenon hearing loss and hearing aids are relatively stable within respondents of each country.

Citing Articles

Cochlear implants in adults with partial deafness: subjective benefits but associated psychological distress.

Kobosko J, Jedrzejczak W, Barej A, Pankowska A, Geremek-Samsonowicz A, Skarzynski H Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 278(5):1387-1394.

PMID: 32671540 PMC: 8057983. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06199-x.


Prevalence of and Characteristics Associated With Self-reported Good Hearing in a Population With Elevated Audiometric Thresholds.

Curti S, Taylor E, Su D, Spankovich C JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 145(7):626-633.

PMID: 31169892 PMC: 6555479. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.1020.


Hearing aids: indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control.

Hoppe U, Hesse G GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; 16:Doc08.

PMID: 29279726 PMC: 5738937. DOI: 10.3205/cto000147.

References
1.
Manchaiah V, Danermark B, Ahmadi T, Tome D, Zhao F, Li Q . Social representation of "hearing loss": cross-cultural exploratory study in India, Iran, Portugal, and the UK. Clin Interv Aging. 2015; 10:1857-72. PMC: 4655910. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S91076. View

2.
Zhao F, Manchaiah V, Claire L, Danermark B, Jones L, Brandreth M . Exploring the influence of culture on hearing help-seeking and hearing-aid uptake. Int J Audiol. 2015; 54(7):435-43. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1005848. View

3.
Manchaiah V, Danermark B, Vinay , Ahmadi T, Tome D, Krishna R . Social representation of hearing aids: cross-cultural study in India, Iran, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. Clin Interv Aging. 2015; 10:1601-15. PMC: 4603629. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S86108. View

4.
Manchaiah V, Baguley D, Pyykko I, Kentala E, Levo H . Positive experiences associated with acquired hearing loss, Ménière's disease, and tinnitus: a review. Int J Audiol. 2014; 54(1):1-10. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.953217. View

5.
Graneheim U, LUNDMAN B . Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24(2):105-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001. View