» Articles » PMID: 26770833

Factors That Could Impact on Liver Fibrosis Staging by Transient Elastography

Overview
Journal Int J Hepatol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2016 Jan 16
PMID 26770833
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transient elastography (TE) based on liver stiffness measurement (LSM) is one of the most validated noninvasive methods for liver fibrosis staging in patients with chronic liver diseases. This method is painless, has no potential complications, is rapid (<10 min), and can be performed at the patient's bedside. However, several points should be considered when interpreting TE results. This review aims to discuss the critical points that might influence liver stiffness and TE results. Spectrum bias and the impact of the prevalence of fibrosis stages should be taken into account when interpreting the studies that validated this method using liver biopsy as a gold-standard. LSM might be influenced by nonfasting status, flare of transaminases, heart failure, extrahepatic cholestasis, presence of steatosis, aetiology of liver disease, type and position of probe, and operator's experience. In addition, interobserver variability can impact on the management of patients with chronic liver diseases. TE should be performed by an experienced operator (>100 exams), in a 3-hour fasting status, and its results should be handled by specialist clinicians that are aware of the limitations of this method.

Citing Articles

Comparison of non-invasive methods of assessing liver fibrosis in combination ART-experienced Zimbabweans.

Nherera B, Mhandire K, Nyazika T, Makura A, Musarurwa C, Mapondera P South Afr J HIV Med. 2024; 20(1):844.

PMID: 39391097 PMC: 11466027. DOI: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v20i1.844.


Reproducibility and Repeatability of US Shear-Wave and Transient Elastography in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Pierce T, Ozturk A, Sherlock S, Moura Cunha G, Wang X, Li Q Radiology. 2024; 312(3):e233094.

PMID: 39254458 PMC: 11427856. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233094.


Correlation between controlled attenuation parameter values with SYNTAX score in patients with significant coronary artery disease.

Sardjan J, Lesmana C, Rusdi L, Kurniawan J, Yunihastuti E, Susilo A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):15382.

PMID: 38965252 PMC: 11224258. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63792-4.


Liver stiffness as measured by transient elastography is a predictor of outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced, mid-range, and recovered left-ventricular ejection fraction.

de Avila D, Andrade T, Mocarzel L, Gismondi R, Cabrita C, Mesquita E Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 11:100048.

PMID: 38559319 PMC: 10978140. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100048.


Non-Invasive Diagnostic of NAFLD in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Risk Stratification: Strengths and Limitations.

Boeriu A, Dobru D, Fofiu C Life (Basel). 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 38137863 PMC: 10744403. DOI: 10.3390/life13122262.


References
1.
Poynard T, Ngo Y, Munteanu M, Thabut D, Ratziu V . Noninvasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B. Curr Hepat Rep. 2011; 10(2):87-97. PMC: 3085108. DOI: 10.1007/s11901-011-0096-0. View

2.
Perazzo H, Fernandes F, Castro Filho E, Perez R . Points to be considered when using transient elastography for diagnosis of portal hypertension according to the Baveno's VI consensus. J Hepatol. 2015; 63(4):1048-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.06.036. View

3.
Arena U, Vizzutti F, Corti G, Ambu S, Stasi C, Bresci S . Acute viral hepatitis increases liver stiffness values measured by transient elastography. Hepatology. 2007; 47(2):380-4. DOI: 10.1002/hep.22007. View

4.
Poynard T, Lenaour G, Vaillant J, Capron F, Munteanu M, Eyraud D . Liver biopsy analysis has a low level of performance for diagnosis of intermediate stages of fibrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10(6):657-63.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.01.023. View

5.
Colli A, Pozzoni P, Berzuini A, Gerosa A, Canovi C, Molteni E . Decompensated chronic heart failure: increased liver stiffness measured by means of transient elastography. Radiology. 2010; 257(3):872-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100013. View