Differences in Women's Use of Medical Help for Becoming Pregnant by the Level of Urbanization of County of Residence in Georgia

Overview

Journal J Rural Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2016 Jan 16

PMID 26769080

Citations 6

Authors

Helen B Chin

Michael R Kramer

Ann C Mertens

Jessica B Spencer

Penelope P Howards

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Our goal was to determine if there are differences by place of residence in visiting a doctor for help getting pregnant in a population-based study.

Methods: Using data from the Furthering Understanding of Cancer, Health, and Survivorship in Adult (FUCHSIA) Women's Study, a cohort study of fertility outcomes in reproductive-aged women in Georgia, we fit models to estimate the association between geographic type of residence and seeking help for becoming pregnant.

Findings: The prevalence of visiting a doctor for help getting pregnant ranged from 13% to 17% across geographic groups. Women living in suburban counties were most likely to seek medical care for help getting pregnant compared with women living in urbanized counties (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.74-1.75); among women who reported infertility this difference was more pronounced (aPR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.00-2.53). Women living in rural counties were equally likely to seek fertility care compared with women in urbanized counties in the full sample and among women who experienced infertility.

Conclusions: Women living in urban and rural counties were least likely to seek infertility care, suggesting that factors including but not limited to physical proximity to providers are influencing utilization of this type of care. Increased communication about reproductive goals and infertility care available to meet these goals by providers who women see for regular care may help address these barriers.

Citing Articles

The impact of sickle cell disease and its treatment on ovarian reserve in reproductive-aged Black women.

Shandley L, Fasano R, Spencer J, Mertens A, McPherson L, Dixon M Br J Haematol. 2024; 205(2):674-685.

PMID: 38841818 PMC: 11315638. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19582.

The use of fertility treatments among reproductive-aged women after cancer.

Kipling L, Shandley L, Mertens A, Spencer J, Howards P Fertil Steril. 2023; 121(4):578-588.

PMID: 38103881 PMC: 10978287. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.012.

Pharmacists' roles in assisted reproductive technology.

Mackay A, Taylor S, Glass B Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023; 12:100376.

PMID: 38094712 PMC: 10716023. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100376.

Strong social disparities in access to IVF/ICSI despite free cost of treatment: a French population-based nationwide cohort study.

Ben Messaoud K, Guibert J, Bouyer J, de La Rochebrochard E BMC Womens Health. 2023; 23(1):621.

PMID: 37993813 PMC: 10664362. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02784-4.

Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.

Huddleston A, Ray K, Bacani R, Staggs J, Anderson R, Vassar M Reprod Sci. 2023; 30(8):2373-2396.

PMID: 37099229 PMC: 10132432. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6.

References

Hartley D, Quam L, Lurie N . Urban and rural differences in health insurance and access to care. J Rural Health. 1994; 10(2):98-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1994.tb00216.x. View

Dis J . MSJAMA. Where we live: health care in rural vs urban America. JAMA. 2002; 287(1):108. View

Sunderam S, Kissin D, Crawford S, Anderson J, Folger S, Jamieson D . Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013; 62(9):1-24. View

Chachamovich J, Chachamovich E, Ezer H, Fleck M, Knauth D, Passos E . Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 31(2):101-10. DOI: 10.3109/0167482X.2010.481337. View

Stephens J, Brotherton S, Dunning S, Emerson L, Gilbertson D, Harrison D . Geographic disparities in patient travel for dialysis in the United States. J Rural Health. 2013; 29(4):339-48. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12022. View

Borrero S, Nikolajski C, Steinberg J, Freedman L, Akers A, Ibrahim S . "It just happens": a qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning. Contraception. 2014; 91(2):150-6. PMC: 4303515. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.09.014. View

. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012; 99(1):63. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.023. View

Mullen M, Wiebe D, Bowman A, Wolff C, Albright K, Roy J . Disparities in accessibility of certified primary stroke centers. Stroke. 2014; 45(11):3381-8. PMC: 4282182. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006021. View

Ingram D, Franco S . 2013 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. Vital Health Stat 2. 2014; (166):1-73. View

10.

Chandra A, Copen C, Stephen E . Infertility service use in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982-2010. Natl Health Stat Report. 2014; (73):1-21. View

11.

Doty B, Zuckerman R, Finlayson S, Jenkins P, Rieb N, Heneghan S . How does degree of rurality impact the provision of surgical services at rural hospitals?. J Rural Health. 2008; 24(3):306-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2008.00173.x. View

12.

Hart L, Salsberg E, Phillips D, Lishner D . Rural health care providers in the United States. J Rural Health. 2002; 18 Suppl:211-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2002.tb00932.x. View

13.

Henne M, Bundorf M . Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. Fertil Steril. 2007; 89(1):66-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.167. View

14.

OConnor A, Wellenius G . Rural-urban disparities in the prevalence of diabetes and coronary heart disease. Public Health. 2012; 126(10):813-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.05.029. View

15.

Nangia A, Likosky D, Wang D . Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2008; 93(3):745-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.037. View

16.

Missmer S, Seifer D, Jain T . Cultural factors contributing to health care disparities among patients with infertility in Midwestern United States. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95(6):1943-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.039. View

17.

Greil A, McQuillan J, Johnson K, Slauson-Blevins K, Shreffler K . The hidden infertile: infertile women without pregnancy intent in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2009; 93(6):2080-3. PMC: 2847620. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.024. View

18.

Fields B, Bell J, Moyce S, Bigbee J . The impact of insurance instability on health service utilization: does non-metropolitan residence make a difference?. J Rural Health. 2014; 31(1):27-34. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12077. View

19.

Chambers G, Sullivan E, Ishihara O, Chapman M, Adamson G . The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91(6):2281-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.029. View

20.

Chin H, Johnson C, Kim K, Knight J, Mertens A, Mink P . Piloting a computer assisted telephone interview: the FUCHSIA Women's Study. BMC Womens Health. 2014; 14:149. PMC: 4261975. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-014-0149-y. View