Polymer-Free Biolimus A9-Coated Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions: 4- and 12-Month Angiographic Follow-Up and Final 5-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Prospective, Multicenter BioFreedom FIM Clinical Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcomes of a novel polymer/carrier-free drug-coated stent (DCS) in patients with de novo coronary lesions.
Background: The BioFreedom (BFD) DCS incorporates a low-profile, stainless-steel platform, with a surface that has been modified to create a selectively microstructured abluminal surface that allows adhesion and further release of Biolimus A9 (Biosensors Europe SA, Morges, Switzerland).
Methods: A total of 182 patients (183 lesions) were randomized into a 1:1:1 ratio for treatment with BFD "standard dose" (BFD) or BFD "low dose" (BFD-LD) versus first-generation paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) at 4 sites in Germany.
Results: Baseline and procedural characteristics were well matched. At 4-month angiographic follow-up (Cohort 1, n = 75), in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) was significantly lower with BFD and BFD-LD versus PES (0.08 and 0.12 mm vs. 0.37 mm, respectively; p < 0.0001 for BFD vs. PES, and p = 0.002 for BFD-LD vs. PES). At 12 months (Cohort 2, n = 107), in-stent LLL (primary endpoint) was 0.17 mm in BFD versus 0.35 mm in PES (p = 0.001 for noninferiority; p = 0.11 for superiority); however, the BFD-LD (0.22 mm) did not reach noninferiority (p = 0.21). At 5 years (175 of 182), there were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events (23.8%, 26.4%, and 20.3%) and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (10.8%, 13.4%, and 10.2%) for BFD, BFD-LD, and PES, respectively; also, there was no definite/probable stent thrombosis reported.
Conclusions: The BFD, but not the BFD-LD, demonstrated noninferiority versus PES in terms of in-stent LLL, a surrogate of neointimal hyperplasia, at 12-month follow-up. At 5 years, clinical event rates were similar, without occurrence of stent thrombosis in all groups. (BioFreedom FIM Clinical Trial; NCT01172119).
Piccolo R, Calabro P, Carrara G, Varricchio A, Baldi C, Napolitano G EuroIntervention. 2025; 21(1):58-72.
PMID: 39773824 PMC: 11684330. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00657.
Yang O, Teng Y, Zhang R, Qu J Int J Nanomedicine. 2024; 19:11689-11700.
PMID: 39553456 PMC: 11566208. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S482608.
Fluder-Wlodarczyk J, Pawlowski S, Chuchra P, Pawlowski T, Wojakowski W, Gasior P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).
PMID: 38541955 PMC: 10971624. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061730.
Talasaz A, Sadeghipour P, Ortega-Paz L, Kakavand H, Aghakouchakzadeh M, Beavers C Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024; 21(8):574-592.
PMID: 38509244 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-024-01003-3.
Individualizing Medicinal Therapy Post Heart Stent Implantation: Tailoring for Patient Factors.
Mohamad T, Jyotsna F, Farooq U, Fatima A, Kar I, Khuwaja S Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e43977.
PMID: 37746355 PMC: 10516147. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43977.