» Articles » PMID: 26762911

Polymer-Free Biolimus A9-Coated Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions: 4- and 12-Month Angiographic Follow-Up and Final 5-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Prospective, Multicenter BioFreedom FIM Clinical Trial

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2016 Jan 15
PMID 26762911
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcomes of a novel polymer/carrier-free drug-coated stent (DCS) in patients with de novo coronary lesions.

Background: The BioFreedom (BFD) DCS incorporates a low-profile, stainless-steel platform, with a surface that has been modified to create a selectively microstructured abluminal surface that allows adhesion and further release of Biolimus A9 (Biosensors Europe SA, Morges, Switzerland).

Methods: A total of 182 patients (183 lesions) were randomized into a 1:1:1 ratio for treatment with BFD "standard dose" (BFD) or BFD "low dose" (BFD-LD) versus first-generation paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) at 4 sites in Germany.

Results: Baseline and procedural characteristics were well matched. At 4-month angiographic follow-up (Cohort 1, n = 75), in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) was significantly lower with BFD and BFD-LD versus PES (0.08 and 0.12 mm vs. 0.37 mm, respectively; p < 0.0001 for BFD vs. PES, and p = 0.002 for BFD-LD vs. PES). At 12 months (Cohort 2, n = 107), in-stent LLL (primary endpoint) was 0.17 mm in BFD versus 0.35 mm in PES (p = 0.001 for noninferiority; p = 0.11 for superiority); however, the BFD-LD (0.22 mm) did not reach noninferiority (p = 0.21). At 5 years (175 of 182), there were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events (23.8%, 26.4%, and 20.3%) and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (10.8%, 13.4%, and 10.2%) for BFD, BFD-LD, and PES, respectively; also, there was no definite/probable stent thrombosis reported.

Conclusions: The BFD, but not the BFD-LD, demonstrated noninferiority versus PES in terms of in-stent LLL, a surrogate of neointimal hyperplasia, at 12-month follow-up. At 5 years, clinical event rates were similar, without occurrence of stent thrombosis in all groups. (BioFreedom FIM Clinical Trial; NCT01172119).

Citing Articles

Polymer-free versus biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an assessor-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

Piccolo R, Calabro P, Carrara G, Varricchio A, Baldi C, Napolitano G EuroIntervention. 2025; 21(1):58-72.

PMID: 39773824 PMC: 11684330. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00657.


Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stent and Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Yang O, Teng Y, Zhang R, Qu J Int J Nanomedicine. 2024; 19:11689-11700.

PMID: 39553456 PMC: 11566208. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S482608.


Importance of Short-Term Neointimal Coverage of Drug-Eluting Stents in the Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

Fluder-Wlodarczyk J, Pawlowski S, Chuchra P, Pawlowski T, Wojakowski W, Gasior P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38541955 PMC: 10971624. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061730.


Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in patients with coexisting cardiovascular and gastrointestinal disease.

Talasaz A, Sadeghipour P, Ortega-Paz L, Kakavand H, Aghakouchakzadeh M, Beavers C Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024; 21(8):574-592.

PMID: 38509244 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-024-01003-3.


Individualizing Medicinal Therapy Post Heart Stent Implantation: Tailoring for Patient Factors.

Mohamad T, Jyotsna F, Farooq U, Fatima A, Kar I, Khuwaja S Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e43977.

PMID: 37746355 PMC: 10516147. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43977.