» Articles » PMID: 26761645

The Curious Acoustic Behavior of Estuarine Snapping Shrimp: Temporal Patterns of Snapping Shrimp Sound in Sub-Tidal Oyster Reef Habitat

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Jan 14
PMID 26761645
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ocean soundscapes convey important sensory information to marine life. Like many mid-to-low latitude coastal areas worldwide, the high-frequency (>1.5 kHz) soundscape of oyster reef habitat within the West Bay Marine Reserve (36°N, 76°W) is dominated by the impulsive, short-duration signals generated by snapping shrimp. Between June 2011 and July 2012, a single hydrophone deployed within West Bay was programmed to record 60 or 30 seconds of acoustic data every 15 or 30 minutes. Envelope correlation and amplitude information were then used to count shrimp snaps within these recordings. The observed snap rates vary from 1500-2000 snaps per minute during summer to <100 snaps per minute during winter. Sound pressure levels are positively correlated with snap rate (r = 0.71-0.92) and vary seasonally by ~15 decibels in the 1.5-20 kHz range. Snap rates are positively correlated with water temperatures (r = 0.81-0.93), as well as potentially influenced by climate-driven changes in water quality. Light availability modulates snap rate on diurnal time scales, with most days exhibiting a significant preference for either nighttime or daytime snapping, and many showing additional crepuscular increases. During mid-summer, the number of snaps occurring at night is 5-10% more than predicted by a random model; however, this pattern is reversed between August and April, with an excess of up to 25% more snaps recorded during the day in the mid-winter. Diurnal variability in sound pressure levels is largest in the mid-winter, when the overall rate of snapping is at its lowest, and the percentage difference between daytime and nighttime activity is at its highest. This work highlights our lack of knowledge regarding the ecology and acoustic behavior of one of the most dominant soniforous invertebrate species in coastal systems. It also underscores the necessity of long-duration, high-temporal-resolution sampling in efforts to understand the bioacoustics of animal behaviors and associated changes within the marine soundscape.

Citing Articles

Bioimaging marine crustacean brain: quantitative comparison of micro-CT preparations in an Alpheid snapping shrimp.

Chapuis L, Andres C, Gerneke D, Radford C Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1428825.

PMID: 39659887 PMC: 11628493. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1428825.


Anthropogenic noise disrupts acoustic cues for recruitment.

Williams B, McAfee D, Connell S Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2027):20240741.

PMID: 39043238 PMC: 11265905. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0741.


Deep-Learning-Based detection of recreational vessels in an estuarine soundscape in the May River, South Carolina, USA.

Ji Y, Marian A, Montie E PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0302497.

PMID: 38976700 PMC: 11230565. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302497.


Moonlight-driven biological choruses in Hawaiian coral reefs.

Duane D, Freeman S, Freeman L PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0299916.

PMID: 38507354 PMC: 10954159. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299916.


The Biological and Anthropogenic Soundscape of an Urbanized Port - the Charleston Harbor Estuary, South Carolina, USA.

Transue L, Monczak A, Tribble C, Marian A, Fair P, Ballenger J PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0283848.

PMID: 37074986 PMC: 10115300. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283848.


References
1.
Radford C, Jeffs A, Tindle C, Montgomery J . Temporal patterns in ambient noise of biological origin from a shallow water temperate reef. Oecologia. 2008; 156(4):921-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1041-y. View

2.
Versluis M, Schmitz B, VON DER HEYDT A, Lohse D . How snapping shrimp snap: through cavitating bubbles. Science. 2000; 289(5487):2114-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5487.2114. View

3.
Lillis A, Eggleston D, Bohnenstiehl D . Oyster larvae settle in response to habitat-associated underwater sounds. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e79337. PMC: 3813695. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079337. View

4.
Hughes A, Mann D, Kimbro D . Predatory fish sounds can alter crab foraging behaviour and influence bivalve abundance. Proc Biol Sci. 2014; 281(1788):20140715. PMC: 4083791. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0715. View

5.
Montgomery J, Jeffs A, Simpson S, Meekan M, Tindle C . Sound as an orientation cue for the pelagic larvae of reef fishes and decapod crustaceans. Adv Mar Biol. 2006; 51:143-96. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2881(06)51003-X. View