» Articles » PMID: 26753627

Understanding the Effects of Different HIV Transmission Models in Individual-based Microsimulation of HIV Epidemic Dynamics in People Who Inject Drugs

Overview
Date 2016 Jan 13
PMID 26753627
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated how different models of HIV transmission, and assumptions regarding the distribution of unprotected sex and syringe-sharing events ('risk acts'), affect quantitative understanding of HIV transmission process in people who inject drugs (PWID). The individual-based model simulated HIV transmission in a dynamic sexual and injecting network representing New York City. We constructed four HIV transmission models: model 1, constant probabilities; model 2, random number of sexual and parenteral acts; model 3, viral load individual assigned; and model 4, two groups of partnerships (low and high risk). Overall, models with less heterogeneity were more sensitive to changes in numbers risk acts, producing HIV incidence up to four times higher than that empirically observed. Although all models overestimated HIV incidence, micro-simulations with greater heterogeneity in the HIV transmission modelling process produced more robust results and better reproduced empirical epidemic dynamics.

Citing Articles

Agent based modelling of blood borne viruses: a scoping review.

Ale S, Hunter E, Kelleher J BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):1411.

PMID: 39695997 PMC: 11653803. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-10271-w.


The role of depression in secondary HIV transmission among people who inject drugs in Vietnam: A mathematical modeling analysis.

Levintow S, Pence B, Sripaipan T, Ha T, Chu V, Quan V PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0275995.

PMID: 36240142 PMC: 9565425. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275995.


Extent and implications of omitted ties on network measures in a longitudinal social network survey of people who use drugs.

Upton E, Rudolph A, Ward P, Havens J, Young A Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022; 238:109554.

PMID: 35850026 PMC: 9514791. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109554.


Predicting the Effectiveness of Endemic Infectious Disease Control Interventions: The Impact of Mass Action versus Network Model Structure.

Malloy G, Goldhaber-Fiebert J, Enns E, Brandeau M Med Decis Making. 2021; 41(6):623-640.

PMID: 33899563 PMC: 8295189. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211006025.


Introducing CASCADEPOP: an open-source sociodemographic simulation platform for us health policy appraisal.

Brennan A, Buckley C, Vu T, Probst C, Nielsen A, Bai H Int J Microsimul. 2021; 13(2):21-60.

PMID: 33884027 PMC: 8057701. DOI: 10.34196/ijm.00217.


References
1.
Vittinghoff E, Douglas J, Judson F, McKirnan D, MacQueen K, Buchbinder S . Per-contact risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission between male sexual partners. Am J Epidemiol. 1999; 150(3):306-11. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010003. View

2.
Landovitz R, Fletcher J, Inzhakova G, Lake J, Shoptaw S, Reback C . A novel combination HIV prevention strategy: post-exposure prophylaxis with contingency management for substance abuse treatment among methamphetamine-using men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012; 26(6):320-8. PMC: 3366332. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2011.0432. View

3.
van Kesteren N, Hospers H, Kok G . Sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 65(1):5-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.003. View

4.
Anderson J, Carey J, Taveras S . HIV testing among the general US population and persons at increased risk: information from national surveys, 1987-1996. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90(7):1089-95. PMC: 1446310. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.90.7.1089. View

5.
Lieb S, Friedman S, Zeni M, Chitwood D, Liberti T, Gates G . An HIV prevalence-based model for estimating urban risk populations of injection drug users and men who have sex with men. J Urban Health. 2004; 81(3):401-15. PMC: 3455939. DOI: 10.1093/jurban/jth126. View