» Articles » PMID: 26751085

The Impact of Failing to Identify Suspect Effort in Patients Undergoing Adult Attention-deficit/hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Assessment

Overview
Journal Psychol Assess
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2016 Jan 12
PMID 26751085
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 28(10) of (see record 2016-22725-001). In the article, the penultimate sentence of the abstract should read “These results suggest that a significant percentage of those making a suspect effort will be diagnosed with ADHD using the most commonly employed assessment methods: an interview alone (71%); an interview and ADHD behavior rating scales combined (65%); and an interview, behavior rating scales, and most continuous performance tests combined (62%).” All versions of this article have been corrected.] This retrospective study examines how many adult patients would plausibly receive a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) if performance and symptom validity measures were not administered during neuropsychological evaluations. Five hundred fifty-four patients were extracted from an archival clinical dataset. A total of 102 were diagnosed with ADHD based on cognitive testing, behavior rating scales, effort testing, and clinical interview; 115 were identified as putting forth suspect effort in accordance with the Slick, Sherman, and Iverson (1999) criteria. From a clinical decision-making perspective, suspect effort and ADHD groups were nearly indistinguishable on ADHD behavior, executive function, and functional impairment rating scales, as well as on cognitive testing and key clinical interview questions. These results suggest that a significant percentage of those making a suspect effort will be diagnosed with ADHD using the most commonly employed assessment methods: an interview alone (71%); an interview and ADHD behavior rating scales combined (65%); and an interview, behavior rating scales, and most continuous performance tests combined (62%) [corrected]. This research makes clear that it is essential to evaluate task engagement and possible symptom amplification during clinical evaluations.

Citing Articles

Assessing Inhibitory Control Deficits in Adult ADHD: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Stop-signal Task.

Senkowski D, Ziegler T, Singh M, Heinz A, He J, Silk T Neuropsychol Rev. 2023; 34(2):548-567.

PMID: 37300725 PMC: 11166755. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-023-09592-5.


Feigning Adult ADHD on a Comprehensive Neuropsychological Test Battery: An Analogue Study.

Becke M, Tucha L, Butzbach M, Aschenbrenner S, Weisbrod M, Tucha O Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36901080 PMC: 10001580. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054070.


Performance Validity Test Failure in the Clinical Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Rates.

Roor J, Peters M, Dandachi-FitzGerald B, Ponds R Neuropsychol Rev. 2023; 34(1):299-319.

PMID: 36872398 PMC: 10920461. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-023-09582-7.


Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners' adult ADHD rating scales.

Becke M, Tucha L, Weisbrod M, Aschenbrenner S, Tucha O, Fuermaier A J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2021; 128(7):1045-1063.

PMID: 33651237 PMC: 8295107. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-021-02318-y.


A comparison of the self-report patterns of analog versus real-world malingerers of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Harrison A, Armstrong I J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020; 128(7):1065-1077.

PMID: 33151414 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-020-02273-0.