» Articles » PMID: 26748646

Normal Skeletal Development and Imaging Pitfalls of the Calcaneal Apophysis: MRI Features

Overview
Journal Skeletal Radiol
Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology
Date 2016 Jan 11
PMID 26748646
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Heel pain in children and secondary MR imaging (MRI) of the hindfoot have been increasing in incidence. Our purpose is to illustrate the, previously unreported, MRI stages in development of the posterior calcaneal apophysis, with attention to imaging pitfalls. This should aid in distinguishing normal growth from true disease.

Material And Methods: Consecutive ankle MRIs in children <18 years, from 2008-2014, were subdivided into 0≤5, 5≤10, 10≤15 and 15≤18 age groups and retrospectively reviewed for development of the calcaneal apophysis.

Results: 204 ankle MRI studies in 188 children were identified. 40 studies were excluded with final cohort of 164 studies in 154 patients (82 boys, 72 girls). The calcaneal apophysis was cartilaginous until age 5. Foci of decreased as well as increased signal were embedded in cartilage, prior to ossification. Early, secondary ossification centers appeared in plantar third of the apophysis in 100% of children by age 7. Increased T2 signal in the ossifications was seen in 30% of children. Apohyseal fusion began at 12 and was complete in 78% of 14≤15 year olds and in 88% of 15≤18 year olds. Curvilinear low signal in the ossification centers, paralleling, but distinguished from growth plate, and not be confused with fracture line, was common.

Conclusion: Development of the posterior calcaneus follows a unique sequence. Apophyseal fusion occurs earlier than reported in the literature. Familiarity with this maturation pattern, in particular the apophyseal increased T2 signal and the linear low signal paralleling the growth plate, will avoid misinterpreting it for pathology.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Link Between Calcaneal Apophysis Maturation and Heel Pain in Youth Baseball Players.

Honma Y, Tsutsui T, Sakamaki W, Higuchi A, Nakamura E, Torii S Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(10):23259671241253861.

PMID: 39430116 PMC: 11489962. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241253861.


Quantifying the ossification and fusion of the calcaneal apophysis using computed tomography.

Blythe C, Reynolds M, Gregory L J Anat. 2022; 241(2):484-499.

PMID: 35468228 PMC: 9296023. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13677.


Radiographic study of Sever's disease.

Gao Y, Liu J, Li Y, Liu Q, Xu S Exp Ther Med. 2020; 20(2):933-937.

PMID: 32742336 PMC: 7388271. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8796.


Bohler Angle and the Crucial Angle of Gissane in Paediatric Population.

Pombo B, Ferreira A, Costa L Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 12:1179544119835227.

PMID: 30890861 PMC: 6416676. DOI: 10.1177/1179544119835227.

References
1.
Ross S, CAFFEY J . Ossification of the calcaneal apophysis in healthy children: some normal radiographic features. Stanford Med Bull. 1957; 15(3):224-6. View

2.
Zawin J, Jaramillo D . Conversion of bone marrow in the humerus, sternum, and clavicle: changes with age on MR images. Radiology. 1993; 188(1):159-64. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.188.1.8511291. View

3.
Jaramillo D, Waters P . MR imaging of the normal developmental anatomy of the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1997; 5(3):501-13. View

4.
Laor T, Jaramillo D . MR imaging insights into skeletal maturation: what is normal?. Radiology. 2008; 250(1):28-38. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2501071322. View

5.
Kwong S, Kothary S, Poncinelli L . Skeletal development of the proximal humerus in the pediatric population: MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202(2):418-25. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10711. View