» Articles » PMID: 26731116

Exploring the Potential Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of AIDS Vaccine Within a Comprehensive HIV/AIDS Response in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Jan 6
PMID 26731116
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Investment Framework Enhanced (IFE) proposed in 2013 by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) explored how maximizing existing interventions and adding emerging prevention options, including a vaccine, could further reduce new HIV infections and AIDS-related deaths in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This article describes additional modeling which looks more closely at the potential health impact and cost-effectiveness of AIDS vaccination in LMICs as part of UNAIDS IFE.

Methods: An epidemiological model was used to explore the potential impact of AIDS vaccination in LMICs in combination with other interventions through 2070. Assumptions were based on perspectives from research, vaccination and public health experts, as well as observations from other HIV/AIDS interventions and vaccination programs. Sensitivity analyses varied vaccine efficacy, duration of protection, coverage, and cost.

Results: If UNAIDS IFE goals were fully achieved, new annual HIV infections in LMICs would decline from 2.0 million in 2014 to 550,000 in 2070. A 70% efficacious vaccine introduced in 2027 with three doses, strong uptake and five years of protection would reduce annual new infections by 44% over the first decade, by 65% the first 25 years and by 78% to 122,000 in 2070. Vaccine impact would be much greater if the assumptions in UNAIDS IFE were not fully achieved. An AIDS vaccine would be cost-effective within a wide range of scenarios.

Interpretation: Even a modestly effective vaccine could contribute strongly to a sustainable response to HIV/AIDS and be cost-effective, even with optimistic assumptions about other interventions. Higher efficacy would provide even greater impact and cost-effectiveness, and would support broader access. Vaccine efficacy and cost per regimen are critical in achieving cost-effectiveness, with cost per regimen being particularly critical in low-income countries and at lower efficacy levels.

Citing Articles

Direct intranodal tonsil vaccination with modified vaccinia Ankara vaccine protects macaques from highly pathogenic SIVmac251.

Mattathil J, Volz A, Onabajo O, Maynard S, Bixler S, Shen X Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):1264.

PMID: 36882405 PMC: 9990026. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36907-0.


Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Biomedical, Non-Surgical HIV Prevention Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review.

Bozzani F, Terris-Prestholt F, Quaife M, Gafos M, Indravudh P, Giddings R Pharmacoeconomics. 2022; 41(5):467-480.

PMID: 36529838 PMC: 10085926. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01223-w.


A clade C HIV-1 vaccine protects against heterologous SHIV infection by modulating IgG glycosylation and T helper response in macaques.

Sahoo A, Jones A, Cheedarla N, Gangadhara S, Roy V, Styles T Sci Immunol. 2022; 7(73):eabl4102.

PMID: 35867800 PMC: 9410801. DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abl4102.


Deep sequencing of the HIV-1 polymerase gene for characterisation of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes during early and chronic disease stages.

Nkone P, Loubser S, Quinn T, Redd A, Ismail A, Tiemessen C Virol J. 2022; 19(1):56.

PMID: 35346259 PMC: 8959563. DOI: 10.1186/s12985-022-01772-8.


Young at risk-people in Maputo City, Mozambique, present a high willingness to participate in HIV trials: Results from an HIV vaccine preparedness cohort study.

Capitine I, Macicame I, Uanela A, Bhatt N, Yates A, Milazzo M PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0260126.

PMID: 34855790 PMC: 8638929. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260126.


References
1.
Levin A, Wang S, Levin C, Tsu V, Hutubessy R . Costs of introducing and delivering HPV vaccines in low and lower middle income countries: inputs for GAVI policy on introduction grant support to countries. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e101114. PMC: 4072768. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101114. View

2.
Raymond A, Hill A, Pozniak A . Large disparities in HIV treatment cascades between eight European and high-income countries - analysis of break points. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014; 17(4 Suppl 3):19507. PMC: 4224795. DOI: 10.7448/IAS.17.4.19507. View

3.
Kristiansen P, Diomande F, Ky Ba A, Sanou I, Ouedraogo A, Ouedraogo R . Impact of the serogroup A meningococcal conjugate vaccine, MenAfriVac, on carriage and herd immunity. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 56(3):354-63. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis892. View

4.
Lema D, Garcia A, De Sanctis J . HIV vaccines: a brief overview. Scand J Immunol. 2014; 80(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1111/sji.12184. View

5.
Levine O, Knoll M, Jones A, Walker D, Risko N, Gilani Z . Global status of Haemophilus influenzae type b and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: evidence, policies, and introductions. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010; 23(3):236-41. DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328338c135. View