Receptor for Detection of a Type II Sex Pheromone in the Winter Moth Operophtera Brumata

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2016 Jan 6

PMID 26729427

Citations 16

Authors

Dan-Dan Zhang

Hong-Lei Wang

Anna Schultze

Heidrun Fross

Wittko Francke

Jurgen Krieger

Christer Lofstedt

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

How signal diversity evolves under stabilizing selection in a pheromone-based mate recognition system is a conundrum. Female moths produce two major types of sex pheromones, i.e., long-chain acetates, alcohols and aldehydes (Type I) and polyenic hydrocarbons and epoxides (Type II), along different biosynthetic pathways. Little is known on how male pheromone receptor (PR) genes evolved to perceive the different pheromones. We report the identification of the first PR tuned to Type II pheromones, namely ObruOR1 from the winter moth, Operophtera brumata (Geometridae). ObruOR1 clusters together with previously ligand-unknown orthologues in the PR subfamily for the ancestral Type I pheromones, suggesting that O. brumata did not evolve a new type of PR to match the novel Type II signal but recruited receptors within an existing PR subfamily. AsegOR3, the ObruOR1 orthologue previously cloned from the noctuid Agrotis segetum that has Type I acetate pheromone components, responded significantly to another Type II hydrocarbon, suggesting that a common ancestor with Type I pheromones had receptors for both types of pheromones, a preadaptation for detection of Type II sex pheromone.

Citing Articles

Transcriptome Profiling of Reveals Candidate Olfactory Genes for Type III Sex Pheromone Detection.

Zhang X, Li S, Luo Z, Cai X, Bian L, Xiu C Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40003873 PMC: 11855508. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041405.

Functional Characterization Supports Multiple Evolutionary Origins of Pheromone Receptors in Bark Beetles.

Biswas T, Sims C, Yuvaraj J, Roberts R, Lofstedt C, Andersson M Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(10).

PMID: 39288326 PMC: 11451568. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae196.

The novel function of an orphan pheromone receptor reveals the sensory specializations of two potential distinct types of sex pheromones in noctuid moth.

Wang C, Cao S, Shi C, Guo M, Sun D, Liu Z Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024; 81(1):259.

PMID: 38878072 PMC: 11335300. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-024-05303-2.

Ionotropic receptors in the turnip moth Agrotis segetum respond to repellent medium-chain fatty acids.

Hou X, Zhang D, Powell D, Wang H, Andersson M, Lofstedt C BMC Biol. 2022; 20(1):34.

PMID: 35130883 PMC: 8822749. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-022-01235-0.

Functional Evolution of a Bark Beetle Odorant Receptor Clade Detecting Monoterpenoids of Different Ecological Origins.

Hou X, Yuvaraj J, Roberts R, Zhang D, Unelius C, Lofstedt C Mol Biol Evol. 2021; 38(11):4934-4947.

PMID: 34293158 PMC: 8557457. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab218.

References

Underhill E, Palaniswamy P, Abrams S, Bailey B, Steck W, Chisholm M . Triunsaturated hydrocarbons, sex pheromone components ofCaenurgina erechtea. J Chem Ecol. 2014; 9(10):1413-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF00990747. View

Schneider D . The sex-attractant receptor of moths. Sci Am. 1974; 231(1):28-35. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0774-28. View

Krieger J, Raming K, Dewer Y, Bette S, Conzelmann S, Breer H . A divergent gene family encoding candidate olfactory receptors of the moth Heliothis virescens. Eur J Neurosci. 2002; 16(4):619-28. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02109.x. View

Lassance J, Groot A, Lienard M, Antony B, Borgwardt C, Andersson F . Allelic variation in a fatty-acyl reductase gene causes divergence in moth sex pheromones. Nature. 2010; 466(7305):486-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature09058. View

Symonds M, Elgar M . The evolution of pheromone diversity. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008; 23(4):220-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.009. View

Baker T . Nearest neural neighbors: moth sex pheromone receptors HR11 and HR13. Chem Senses. 2009; 34(6):465-8. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjp025. View

Groot A, Estock M, Horovitz J, Hamilton J, Santangelo R, Schal C . QTL analysis of sex pheromone blend differences between two closely related moths: Insights into divergence in biosynthetic pathways. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2009; 39(8):568-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.05.002. View

Roelofs W, HILL A, Linn C, Meinwald J, Jain S, Herbert H . Sex pheromone of the winter moth, a geometrid with unusually low temperature precopulatory responses. Science. 1982; 217(4560):657-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.217.4560.657. View

Vosshall L, Hansson B . A unified nomenclature system for the insect olfactory coreceptor. Chem Senses. 2011; 36(6):497-8. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjr022. View

10.

Wanner K, Nichols A, Allen J, Bunger P, Garczynski S, Linn C . Sex pheromone receptor specificity in the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis. PLoS One. 2010; 5(1):e8685. PMC: 2801615. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008685. View

11.

Tillman J, Seybold S, Jurenka R, Blomquist G . Insect pheromones--an overview of biosynthesis and endocrine regulation. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1999; 29(6):481-514. DOI: 10.1016/s0965-1748(99)00016-8. View

12.

Patch H, Velarde R, Walden K, Robertson H . A candidate pheromone receptor and two odorant receptors of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. Chem Senses. 2009; 34(4):305-16. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjp002. View

13.

Bousquet F, Nojima T, Houot B, Chauvel I, Chaudy S, Dupas S . Expression of a desaturase gene, desat1, in neural and nonneural tissues separately affects perception and emission of sex pheromones in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 109(1):249-54. PMC: 3252891. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109166108. View

14.

Millar J, Grant G, McElfresh J, Strong W, Rudolph C, Stein J . (3Z,6Z,9Z, 12Z, 15Z)-Pentacosapentaene, a key pheromone component of the fir coneworm moth, Dioryctria abietivorella. J Chem Ecol. 2005; 31(5):1229-34. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-005-5813-0. View

15.

Schmittgen T, Livak K . Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008; 3(6):1101-8. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. View

16.

Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S . MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30(12):2725-9. PMC: 3840312. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. View

17.

Lassance J, Lofstedt C . Chemical communication: a jewel sheds light on signal evolution. Curr Biol. 2013; 23(9):R346-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.055. View

18.

Symonds M, Elgar M . The mode of pheromone evolution: evidence from bark beetles. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1541):839-46. PMC: 1691658. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2647. View

19.

Molnar B, Troger A, Toshova T, Subchev M, van Nieukerken E, Koster J . Identification of the female-produced sex pheromone of Tischeria ekebladella, an oak leafmining moth. J Chem Ecol. 2012; 38(10):1298-305. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-012-0184-9. View

20.

Larsson M, Domingos A, Jones W, Chiappe M, Amrein H, Vosshall L . Or83b encodes a broadly expressed odorant receptor essential for Drosophila olfaction. Neuron. 2004; 43(5):703-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.019. View