Noisy Decision Thresholds Can Account for Suboptimal Detection of Low Coherence Motion

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2016 Jan 5

PMID 26726736

Authors

Nicholas S C Price

John B VanCuylenberg

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Noise in sensory signals can vary over both space and time. Moving random dot stimuli are commonly used to quantify how the visual system accounts for spatial noise. In these stimuli, a fixed proportion of "signal" dots move in the same direction and the remaining "noise" dots are randomly replotted. The spatial coherence, or proportion of signal versus noise dots, is fixed across time; however, this means that little is known about how temporally-noisy signals are integrated. Here we use a stimulus with low temporal coherence; the signal direction is only presented on a fraction of frames. Human observers are able to reliably detect and discriminate the direction of a 200 ms motion pulse, even when just 25% of frames within the pulse move in the signal direction. Using psychophysical reverse-correlation analyses, we show that observers are strongly influenced by the number of near-target directions spread throughout the pulse, and that consecutive signal frames have only a small additional influence on perception. Finally, we develop a model inspired by the leaky integration of the responses of direction-selective neurons, which reliably represents motion direction, and which can account for observers' sub-optimal detection of motion pulses by incorporating a noisy decision threshold.

References

Perge J, Borghuis B, Bours R, Lankheet M, van Wezel R . Temporal dynamics of direction tuning in motion-sensitive macaque area MT. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 93(4):2104-16. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00601.2004. View

Neri P, Levi D . Temporal dynamics of directional selectivity in human vision. J Vis. 2008; 8(1):22.1-11. DOI: 10.1167/8.1.22. View

Lui L, Bourne J, Rosa M . Functional response properties of neurons in the dorsomedial visual area of New World monkeys (Callithrix jacchus). Cereb Cortex. 2005; 16(2):162-77. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi094. View

Borghuis B, Perge J, Vajda I, van Wezel R, van de Grind W, Lankheet M . The motion reverse correlation (MRC) method: a linear systems approach in the motion domain. J Neurosci Methods. 2003; 123(2):153-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(02)00347-3. View

Vajda I, Lankheet M, Borghuis B, van de Grind W . Dynamics of directional selectivity in area 18 and PMLS of the cat. Cereb Cortex. 2004; 14(7):759-67. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh036. View

Price N, Prescott D . Adaptation to direction statistics modulates perceptual discrimination. J Vis. 2012; 12(6). DOI: 10.1167/12.6.32. View

Newsome W, Pare E . A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). J Neurosci. 1988; 8(6):2201-11. PMC: 6569328. View

Pilly P, Seitz A . What a difference a parameter makes: a psychophysical comparison of random dot motion algorithms. Vision Res. 2009; 49(13):1599-612. PMC: 2789308. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.019. View

Blum J, Price N . Reflexive tracking eye movements and motion perception: one or two neural populations?. J Vis. 2014; 14(3):23. DOI: 10.1167/14.3.23. View

10.

Cohen M, Newsome W . Estimates of the contribution of single neurons to perception depend on timescale and noise correlation. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(20):6635-48. PMC: 2705937. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5179-08.2009. View

11.

Brainard D . The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):433-6. View

12.

Galletti C, Battaglini P, Fattori P . Functional Properties of Neurons in the Anterior Bank of the Parieto-occipital Sulcus of the Macaque Monkey. Eur J Neurosci. 1991; 3(5):452-461. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1991.tb00832.x. View

13.

Ringach D . Tuning of orientation detectors in human vision. Vision Res. 1998; 38(7):963-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00322-2. View

14.

De Bruyn B, Orban G . Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns. Vision Res. 1988; 28(12):1323-35. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90064-8. View

15.

Bair W, Movshon J . Adaptive temporal integration of motion in direction-selective neurons in macaque visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(33):7305-23. PMC: 6729763. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0554-04.2004. View

16.

Watamaniuk S, Sekuler R, Williams D . Direction perception in complex dynamic displays: the integration of direction information. Vision Res. 1989; 29(1):47-59. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90173-9. View

17.

Busse L, Katzner S, Tillmann C, Treue S . Effects of attention on perceptual direction tuning curves in the human visual system. J Vis. 2008; 8(9):2.1-13. DOI: 10.1167/8.9.2. View

18.

Glass L, Perez R . Perception of random dot interference patterns. Nature. 1973; 246(5432):360-2. DOI: 10.1038/246360a0. View

19.

Born R, Bradley D . Structure and function of visual area MT. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005; 28:157-89. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131052. View

20.

Price N, Born R . Timescales of sensory- and decision-related activity in the middle temporal and medial superior temporal areas. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(42):14036-45. PMC: 3059109. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2336-10.2010. View