Inertial Sensor Technology for Elite Swimming Performance Analysis: A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Sensors (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2015 Dec 30

PMID 26712760

Citations 41

Authors

Robert Mooney

Gavin Corley

Alan Godfrey

Leo R Quinlan

Gearoid OLaighin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Technical evaluation of swimming performance is an essential factor of elite athletic preparation. Novel methods of analysis, incorporating body worn inertial sensors (i.e., Microelectromechanical systems, or MEMS, accelerometers and gyroscopes), have received much attention recently from both research and commercial communities as an alternative to video-based approaches. This technology may allow for improved analysis of stroke mechanics, race performance and energy expenditure, as well as real-time feedback to the coach, potentially enabling more efficient, competitive and quantitative coaching. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the literature related to the use of inertial sensors for the technical analysis of swimming performance. This paper focuses on providing an evaluation of the accuracy of different feature detection algorithms described in the literature for the analysis of different phases of swimming, specifically starts, turns and free-swimming. The consequences associated with different sensor attachment locations are also considered for both single and multiple sensor configurations. Additional information such as this should help practitioners to select the most appropriate systems and methods for extracting the key performance related parameters that are important to them for analysing their swimmers' performance and may serve to inform both applied and research practices.

Citing Articles

Effects of different warm-up methods on 50-meter breaststroke swimming performance.

Lee H, Chao T, Hsu C, Chang N, Chen Y, Tsai Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 12():1505648.

PMID: 39840133 PMC: 11746113. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1505648.

Wearable System Applications in Performance Analysis of RaceRunning Athletes with Disabilities.

Shafizadeh M, Davids K Sensors (Basel). 2025; 24(24.

PMID: 39771661 PMC: 11679408. DOI: 10.3390/s24247923.

Automatic Recognition of Motor Skills in Triathlon: A Novel Tool for Measuring Movement Cadence and Cycling Tasks.

Chesher S, Martinotti C, Chapman D, Rosalie S, Charlton P, Netto K J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 39728253 PMC: 11676696. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9040269.

Swimming Velocity Analysis Using Wearable Inertial Sensors and Speedometer: A Comparative Study.

Vieira L, Costa M, Santos C, Ferreira F, Fernandes R, Soares S Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39199715 PMC: 11351135. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080757.

BackMov: Individualized Motion Capture-Based Test to Assess Low Back Pain Mobility Recovery after Treatment.

Villalba-Meneses F, Guevara C, Velasquez-Lopez P, Arias-Serrano I, Guerrero-Ligna S, Valencia-Cevallos C Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(3).

PMID: 38339630 PMC: 10857203. DOI: 10.3390/s24030913.

References

Bouten C, Koekkoek K, Verduin M, Kodde R, Janssen J . A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997; 44(3):136-47. DOI: 10.1109/10.554760. View

Tourny-Chollet C, Chollet D, Hogie S, Papparodopoulos C . Kinematic analysis of butterfly turns of international and national swimmers. J Sports Sci. 2002; 20(5):383-90. DOI: 10.1080/026404102317366636. View

Zhou H, Stone T, Hu H, Harris N . Use of multiple wearable inertial sensors in upper limb motion tracking. Med Eng Phys. 2007; 30(1):123-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.11.010. View

Sanders R . Kinematics, coordination, variability, and biological noise in the prone flutter kick at different levels of a "learn-to-swim" programme. J Sports Sci. 2006; 25(2):213-27. DOI: 10.1080/02640410600631025. View

Mooney R, Corley G, Godfrey A, Osborough C, Newell J, Quinlan L . Analysis of swimming performance: perceptions and practices of US-based swimming coaches. J Sports Sci. 2015; 34(11):997-1005. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1085074. View

Cuesta-Vargas A, Galan-Mercant A, Williams J . The use of inertial sensors system for human motion analysis. Phys Ther Rev. 2013; 15(6):462-473. PMC: 3566464. DOI: 10.1179/1743288X11Y.0000000006. View

Chen K, Bassett Jr D . The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37(11 Suppl):S490-500. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000185571.49104.82. View

Sabatini A . Estimating three-dimensional orientation of human body parts by inertial/magnetic sensing. Sensors (Basel). 2012; 11(2):1489-525. PMC: 3274035. DOI: 10.3390/s110201489. View

Nikodelis T, Kollias I, Hatzitaki V . Bilateral inter-arm coordination in freestyle swimming: effect of skill level and swimming speed. J Sports Sci. 2005; 23(7):737-45. DOI: 10.1080/02640410400021955. View

10.

Blanksby B, Nicholson L, Elliott B . Biomechanical analysis of the grab, track and handle swimming starts: an intervention study. Sports Biomech. 2003; 1(1):11-24. DOI: 10.1080/14763140208522784. View

11.

Dadashi F, Crettenand F, Millet G, Aminian K . Front-crawl instantaneous velocity estimation using a wearable inertial measurement unit. Sensors (Basel). 2012; 12(10):12927-39. PMC: 3545549. DOI: 10.3390/s121012927. View

12.

Seifert L, Chollet D, Bardy B . Effect of swimming velocity on arm coordination in the front crawl: a dynamic analysis. J Sports Sci. 2004; 22(7):651-60. DOI: 10.1080/02640410310001655787. View

13.

Lai X, Liu Q, Wei X, Wang W, Zhou G, Han G . A survey of body sensor networks. Sensors (Basel). 2013; 13(5):5406-47. PMC: 3690007. DOI: 10.3390/s130505406. View

14.

Rowlands A, Stiles V . Accelerometer counts and raw acceleration output in relation to mechanical loading. J Biomech. 2012; 45(3):448-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.006. View

15.

Yang S, Li Q . Inertial sensor-based methods in walking speed estimation: a systematic review. Sensors (Basel). 2012; 12(5):6102-16. PMC: 3386731. DOI: 10.3390/s120506102. View

16.

Supej M . 3D measurements of alpine skiing with an inertial sensor motion capture suit and GNSS RTK system. J Sports Sci. 2010; 28(7):759-69. DOI: 10.1080/02640411003716934. View

17.

Beanland E, Main L, Aisbett B, Gastin P, Netto K . Validation of GPS and accelerometer technology in swimming. J Sci Med Sport. 2013; 17(2):234-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.04.007. View

18.

Bonnet V, Mazza C, McCamley J, Cappozzo A . Use of weighted Fourier linear combiner filters to estimate lower trunk 3D orientation from gyroscope sensors data. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013; 10:29. PMC: 3620521. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-29. View

19.

Fulton S, Pyne D, Burkett B . Optimizing kick rate and amplitude for Paralympic swimmers via net force measures. J Sports Sci. 2011; 29(4):381-7. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2010.536247. View

20.

de Magalhaes F, Vannozzi G, Gatta G, Fantozzi S . Wearable inertial sensors in swimming motion analysis: a systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2014; 33(7):732-45. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2014.962574. View