» Articles » PMID: 26709152

Changes in Prostate Cancer Grading: Including a New Patient-centric Grading System

Overview
Journal Prostate
Date 2015 Dec 29
PMID 26709152
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The first structured approach to grade prostate cancer based on the underlying histological architecture was developed by Donald Gleason who in 1966 proposed a morphologic classification of prostate cancer and in 1974 demonstrated its clinical significance based on prostate cancer-specific death. Contemporarily referred to as the Gleason grading system, it has gained worldwide recognition allowing a more individualized approach to patients with prostate cancer. In 2005, the International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) made the first revisions to the grading system. Subsequently, based on the new discoveries in pathologic and clinical aspects of prostate cancer, as well as the changing nature of the prostate cancer in part due to a robust screening, there was a need for experts to re-visit the approach to grade prostate cancer. In November 2014, the ISUP experts and clinical leaders in prostate cancer from 17 countries conducted a consensus conference in Chicago, IL, USA. The consensus conference defined various grade patterns and proposed the adoption of a new grading system of prostate cancer. Herein, we describe the background and rationale for the changes and provide guidelines to their clinical implementation.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular risk of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus agonist in men with prostate cancer: an observational study in Taiwan.

Shao Y, Hong J, Chen C, Huang C Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022; 26(4):722-729.

PMID: 35662291 PMC: 10638084. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00555-0.


Predicting Insignificant Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the Pathological Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance according to the Pre-International Society of Urological Pathology (Pre-ISUP) 2014 Era the Post-ISUP2014 Era.

Chung M, Cho N, Kim J, Jo Y, Yoon B, Lee S World J Mens Health. 2020; 39(3):550-558.

PMID: 32648380 PMC: 8255396. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.200037.


Automatic Detection of Prostate Tumor Habitats using Diffusion MRI.

Tschudi Y, Pollack A, Punnen S, Ford J, Chang Y, Soodana-Prakash N Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):16801.

PMID: 30429515 PMC: 6235961. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34916-4.


An Automated Multiparametric MRI Quantitative Imaging Prostate Habitat Risk Scoring System for Defining External Beam Radiation Therapy Boost Volumes.

Stoyanova R, Chinea F, Kwon D, Reis I, Tschudi Y, Parra N Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 102(4):821-829.

PMID: 29908220 PMC: 6245650. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.003.


Multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer.

Wildeboer R, Postema A, Demi L, Kuenen M, Wijkstra H, Mischi M Eur Radiol. 2016; 27(8):3226-3234.

PMID: 28004162 PMC: 5491563. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4693-8.