Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Introducing a New Approach

Overview

Journal Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2015 Dec 26

PMID 26703987

Citations 5

Authors

Stylianos Kolovos

Dimitrios Tsiotas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: CTS, the most common nerve entrapment syndrome of the upper limb, is being diagnosed by clinical criteria, in most cases supported by the electrodiagnosis method, which appears limits regarding its sensitivity and specificity and suggests an intervening and expensive technique. The purpose of this study was to contribute to establishing U/S examination as a method with at least of the same accuracy with electrodiagnosis.

Material And Method: A sample of 60 healthy individuals and 30 patients suffering from CTS was scanned. The diagnosis was conducted by both clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria, or by clinical criteria supported by postsurgical outcome.

Method: In order to improve the accuracy of measurements, the anteroposterior to transverse diameter of the median nerve inside the canal and in its entrance was scanned and compared, by sonography. The examination conducted three times for each dimension, and the mean value per individual was calculated.

Results: The mean ratios for the 60 healthy wrists was found to range within the interval 0.49-0.88 (presenting a mean value of 0.66), and the corresponding for the 30 suffering from CTS wrists was within the interval 1.12-1.59 (with a mean value of 1.39).

Conclusion: The statistical analysis of the examination results clearly demonstrates that the interval of ratios over the value 1.07 can be considered completely safe to diagnose that someone is suffering from CTS. In correspondence, a U/S measurement of ratios in the area up to 0.79 is completely safe to opine that this wrist refers to a healthy individual. The intermediate range of ratios 0.79-1.0 suggests a grey zone, which, by the rational of this study, does not include discrete CTS or healthy cases. This "gap" may describe subclinical or mild cases of CTS which were not been taken under consideration and for which there is no rational to interfere surgically. In the everyday's practice clinical point of view, the grey zone cases are considered healthy.

Citing Articles

Diacutaneous Fibrolysis Intervention in Patients with Mild to Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome May Avoid Severe Cases in Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jimenez-Del-Barrio S, Ceballos-Laita L, Bueno-Gracia E, Rodriguez-Marco S, Caudevilla-Polo S, Estebanez-de-Miguel E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(17).

PMID: 36078691 PMC: 9518553. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710983.

Posterior Border Distance: An Effective Diagnostic Measurement for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Ultrasonography.

Meric G, Basdelioglu K, Yanik B, Sargin S, Ulusal A Cureus. 2020; 12(10):e11010.

PMID: 33214939 PMC: 7671083. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11010.

Sensitivity of high-resolution ultrasonography in clinically diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome patients with hand pain and normal nerve conduction studies.

Roghani R, Holisaz M, Norouzi A, Delbari A, Gohari F, Lokk J J Pain Res. 2018; 11:1319-1325.

PMID: 30022850 PMC: 6044364. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S164004.

Motor Examination in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Neral M, Imbriglia J, Carlson L, Wollstein R J Hand Microsurg. 2017; 9(2):67-73.

PMID: 28867905 PMC: 5578813. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603346.

Diagnostic value of median nerve ultrasonography for screening of carpal tunnel syndrome in hypothyroid patients: A cross-sectional study.

Mehrpour M, Mirzaasgari Z, Rohani M, Safdarian M Iran J Neurol. 2016; 15(2):70-4.

PMID: 27326360 PMC: 4912671.

References

Wiesler E, Chloros G, Cartwright M, Smith B, Rushing J, Walker F . The use of diagnostic ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31(5):726-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.01.020. View

Hammer H, Hovden I, Haavardsholm E, Kvien T . Ultrasonography shows increased cross-sectional area of the median nerve in patients with arthritis and carpal tunnel syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005; 45(5):584-8. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei218. View

Kotevoglu N, Gulbahce-Saglam S . Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and its relevance to clinical evaluation. Joint Bone Spine. 2005; 72(2):142-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2004.03.012. View

Buchberger W, Schon G, Strasser K, Jungwirth W . High-resolution ultrasonography of the carpal tunnel. J Ultrasound Med. 1991; 10(10):531-7. DOI: 10.7863/jum.1991.10.10.531. View

Keles I, Karagulle Kendi A, Aydin G, Zog S, Orkun S . Diagnostic precision of ultrasonography in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 84(6):443-50. DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000163715.11645.96. View

Duncan I, Sullivan P, Lomas F . Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173(3):681-4. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.3.10470903. View

Mondelli M, Filippou G, Gallo A, Frediani B . Diagnostic utility of ultrasonography versus nerve conduction studies in mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59(3):357-66. DOI: 10.1002/art.23317. View

Leonard L, Rangan A, Doyle G, Taylor G . Carpal tunnel syndrome - is high-frequency ultrasound a useful diagnostic tool?. J Hand Surg Br. 2003; 28(1):77-9. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2002.0869. View

Miedany Y, Ashour S, Youssef S, Mehanna A, Meky F . Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: old tests-new concepts. Joint Bone Spine. 2008; 75(4):451-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.09.014. View

10.

Nakamichi K, Tachibana S . Enlarged median nerve in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2000; 23(11):1713-8. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4598(200011)23:11<1713::aid-mus7>3.0.co;2-g. View

11.

Klauser A, Halpern E, De Zordo T, Feuchtner G, Arora R, Gruber J . Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with US: value of additional cross-sectional area measurements of the median nerve in patients versus healthy volunteers. Radiology. 2008; 250(1):171-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2501080397. View

12.

Levine D, Simmons B, Koris M, Daltroy L, Hohl G, Fossel A . A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75(11):1585-92. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199311000-00002. View

13.

Chen P, Maklad N, Redwine M, Zelitt D . Dynamic high-resolution sonography of the carpal tunnel. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168(2):533-7. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016242. View

14.

Rempel D, Evanoff B, Amadio P, De Krom M, Franklin G, Franzblau A . Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health. 1998; 88(10):1447-51. PMC: 1508472. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1447. View

15.

El-Karabaty H, Hetzel A, Galla T, Horch R, Lucking C, Glocker F . The effect of carpal tunnel release on median nerve flattening and nerve conduction. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2005; 45(4):223-7. View

16.

Mondelli M, Filippou G, Aretini A, Frediani B, Reale F . Ultrasonography before and after surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome and relationship with clinical and electrophysiological findings. A new outcome predictor?. Scand J Rheumatol. 2008; 37(3):219-24. DOI: 10.1080/03009740801914850. View

17.

Lee D, van Holsbeeck M, Janevski P, Ganos D, Ditmars D, Darian V . Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Ultrasound versus electromyography. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999; 37(4):859-72, x. DOI: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70132-9. View

18.

Buchberger W, Judmaier W, Birbamer G, Lener M, Schmidauer C . Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis with high-resolution sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 159(4):793-8. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.159.4.1529845. View

19.

. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: summary statement. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Muscle Nerve. 1993; 16(12):1390-1. DOI: 10.1002/mus.880161219. View

20.

Kuo M, Leong C, Cheng Y, Chang H . Static wrist position associated with least median nerve compression: sonographic evaluation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 80(4):256-60. DOI: 10.1097/00002060-200104000-00004. View