» Articles » PMID: 26702217

Basics, Common Errors and Essentials of Statistical Tools and Techniques in Anesthesiology Research

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2015 Dec 25
PMID 26702217
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The statistical portion is a vital component of any research study. The research methodology and the application of statistical tools and techniques have evolved over the years and have significantly helped the research activities throughout the globe. The results and inferences are not accurately possible without proper validation with various statistical tools and tests. The evidencebased anesthesia research and practice has to incorporate statistical tools in the methodology right from the planning stage of the study itself. Though the medical fraternity is well acquainted with the significance of statistics in research, there is a lack of in-depth knowledge about the various statistical concepts and principles among majority of the researchers. The clinical impact and consequences can be serious as the incorrect analysis, conclusions, and false results may construct an artificial platform on which future research activities are replicated. The present tutorial is an attempt to make anesthesiologists aware of the various aspects of statistical methods used in evidence-based research and also to highlight the common areas where maximum number of statistical errors are committed so as to adopt better statistical practices.

Citing Articles

Methodological and Statistical Considerations for Cross-Sectional, Case-Control, and Cohort Studies.

Perez-Guerrero E, Guillen-Medina M, Marquez-Sandoval F, Vera-Cruz J, Gallegos-Arreola M, Rico-Mendez M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064045 PMC: 11277135. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144005.


Use of Pearson and Spearman correlation testing in Indian anesthesia journals: An audit.

Tyagi A, Salhotra R, Agrawal A, Vashist I, Malhotra R J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024; 39(4):550-556.

PMID: 38269154 PMC: 10805225. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_13_22.


Characterization and critical appraisal of physiotherapy intervention research in Nigeria: a systematic review.

Nweke M, Ejiroghene E, Fawole H, Mshunqane N BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):27.

PMID: 38166778 PMC: 10763218. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06986-7.


Statistics in medical research: Common mistakes.

AbdulRaheem Y J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023; 18(6):1197-1199.

PMID: 37234723 PMC: 10205532. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.04.004.


Overview of statistical methods usage in Indian anaesthesia publications.

Tyagi A, Garg D, Mohan A, Salhotra R, Vashisth I, Agrawal A Indian J Anaesth. 2023; 66(11):783-788.

PMID: 36590196 PMC: 9795494. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_667_22.


References
1.
Moreira Jr E, Stein Z, Susser E . Reporting on methods of subgroup analysis in clinical trials: a survey of four scientific journals. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2001; 34(11):1441-6. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2001001100011. View

2.
MacArthur R, JACKSON G . An evaluation of the use of statistical methodology in the Journal of Infectious Diseases. J Infect Dis. 1984; 149(3):349-54. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/149.3.349. View

3.
Moher D, Schulz K, Altman D . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134(8):657-62. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00011. View

4.
Altman D . Statistics in medical journals: some recent trends. Stat Med. 2000; 19(23):3275-89. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23<3275::aid-sim626>3.0.co;2-m. View

5.
Bossuyt P, Reitsma J, Bruns D, Gatsonis C, Glasziou P, Irwig L . The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138(1):W1-12. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1. View