» Articles » PMID: 26700877

Standardised Mortality Ratio Based on the Sum of Age and Percentage Total Body Surface Area Burned is an Adequate Quality Indicator in Burn Care: An Exploratory Review

Overview
Journal Burns
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2015 Dec 25
PMID 26700877
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Standardised Mortality Ratio (SMR) based on generic mortality predicting models is an established quality indicator in critical care. Burn-specific mortality models are preferred for the comparison among patients with burns as their predictive value is better. The aim was to assess whether the sum of age (years) and percentage total body surface area burned (which constitutes the Baux score) is acceptable in comparison to other more complex models, and to find out if data collected from a separate burn centre are sufficient for SMR based quality assessment. The predictive value of nine burn-specific models was tested by comparing values from the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and a non-inferiority analysis using 1% as the limit (delta). SMR was analysed by comparing data from seven reference sources, including the North American National Burn Repository (NBR), with the observed mortality (years 1993-2012, n=1613, 80 deaths). The AUC values ranged between 0.934 and 0.976. The AUC 0.970 (95% CI 0.96-0.98) for the Baux score was non-inferior to the other models. SMR was 0.52 (95% CI 0.28-0.88) for the most recent five-year period compared with NBR based data. The analysis suggests that SMR based on the Baux score is eligible as an indicator of quality for setting standards of mortality in burn care. More advanced modelling only marginally improves the predictive value. The SMR can detect mortality differences in data from a single centre.

Citing Articles

High early incidence of sepsis and its impact on organ dysfunction in burn trauma patients: a detailed and hypothesis generating study.

Sjoberg F, Greenhalgh D, Elmasry M, Abdelrahman I, El-Serafi A, Steinvall I Burns Trauma. 2025; 13:tkae085.

PMID: 39931388 PMC: 11808796. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkae085.


Comparison between XGboost model and logistic regression model for predicting sepsis after extremely severe burns.

Liu P, Li X, Zhang T, Huang Y J Int Med Res. 2024; 52(5):3000605241247696.

PMID: 38698505 PMC: 11067675. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241247696.


[Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of sepsis development and death in patients with extremely severe burns].

Pan X, Zhu Z, Shen T, Jin F, Wang X, Yin J Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2023; 39(6):558-564.

PMID: 37805772 PMC: 11630237. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220806-00336.


Survival and analysis of prognostic factors for severe burn patients with inhalation injury: based on the respiratory SOFA score.

Ji Q, Tang J, Li S, Chen J BMC Emerg Med. 2023; 23(1):1.

PMID: 36604623 PMC: 9813898. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-022-00767-6.


Risk Factors For Death And Prognosis Value Of Revised Baux Score For Burn Patients With Inhalation Injury.

Lam N, Minh N Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2022; 35(1):41-45.

PMID: 35582096 PMC: 9020854.