» Articles » PMID: 26697416

Using 4D Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Validate Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Case Study

Overview
Journal Front Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2015 Dec 24
PMID 26697416
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can have a complementary predictive role alongside the exquisite visualization capabilities of 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. In order to exploit these capabilities (e.g., for decision-making), it is necessary to validate computational models against real world data. In this study, we sought to acquire 4D CMR flow data in a controllable, experimental setup and use these data to validate a corresponding computational model. We applied this paradigm to a case of congenital heart disease, namely, transposition of the great arteries (TGA) repaired with arterial switch operation. For this purpose, a mock circulatory loop compatible with the CMR environment was constructed and two detailed aortic 3D models (i.e., one TGA case and one normal aortic anatomy) were tested under realistic hemodynamic conditions, acquiring 4D CMR flow. The same 3D domains were used for multi-scale CFD simulations, whereby the remainder of the mock circulatory system was appropriately summarized with a lumped parameter network. Boundary conditions of the simulations mirrored those measured in vitro. Results showed a very good quantitative agreement between experimental and computational models in terms of pressure (overall maximum % error = 4.4% aortic pressure in the control anatomy) and flow distribution data (overall maximum % error = 3.6% at the subclavian artery outlet of the TGA model). Very good qualitative agreement could also be appreciated in terms of streamlines, throughout the cardiac cycle. Additionally, velocity vectors in the ascending aorta revealed less symmetrical flow in the TGA model, which also exhibited higher wall shear stress in the anterior ascending aorta.

Citing Articles

Machine learning-based prediction of hemodynamic parameters in left coronary artery bifurcation: A CFD approach.

Malek S, Eskandari A, Sharbatdar M Heliyon. 2025; 11(2):e41973.

PMID: 39906857 PMC: 11791239. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41973.


Hemodynamic Analysis in Aortic Dilatation after Arterial Switch Operation for Patients with Transposition of Great Arteries Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Park W, Lee S, Seo J J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024; 18(1):79-90.

PMID: 39320418 PMC: 11885326. DOI: 10.1007/s12265-024-10562-2.


Image2Flow: A proof-of-concept hybrid image and graph convolutional neural network for rapid patient-specific pulmonary artery segmentation and CFD flow field calculation from 3D cardiac MRI data.

Yao T, Pajaziti E, Quail M, Schievano S, Steeden J, Muthurangu V PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(6):e1012231.

PMID: 38900817 PMC: 11218942. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012231.


A 3D scaling law for supravalvular aortic stenosis suited for stethoscopic auscultations.

Ali A, Ghobashy A, Sultan A, Elkhodary K, El-Morsi M Heliyon. 2024; 10(4):e26190.

PMID: 38390109 PMC: 10881376. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26190.


Correct Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Reduces Stagnant Blood Flow and the Risk of Thrombus Formation: A Proof-of-Concept Experimental Study Using 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Cha M, An D, Kang M, Kim H, Kim S, Cho I Korean J Radiol. 2023; 24(7):647-659.

PMID: 37404107 PMC: 10323417. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0173.


References
1.
Biglino G, Verschueren P, Zegels R, Taylor A, Schievano S . Rapid prototyping compliant arterial phantoms for in-vitro studies and device testing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013; 15:2. PMC: 3564729. DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-2. View

2.
de Zelicourt D, Haggerty C, Sundareswaran K, Whited B, Rossignac J, Kanter K . Individualized computer-based surgical planning to address pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in patients with a single ventricle with an interrupted inferior vena cava and azygous continuation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 141(5):1170-7. PMC: 3078987. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.11.032. View

3.
Roldan-Alzate A, Garcia-Rodriguez S, Anagnostopoulos P, Srinivasan S, Wieben O, Francois C . Hemodynamic study of TCPC using in vivo and in vitro 4D Flow MRI and numerical simulation. J Biomech. 2015; 48(7):1325-30. PMC: 4406283. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.009. View

4.
Schievano S, Migliavacca F, Coats L, Khambadkone S, Carminati M, Wilson N . Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation based on rapid prototyping of right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary trunk from MR data. Radiology. 2007; 242(2):490-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2422051994. View

5.
Haggerty C, Restrepo M, Tang E, de Zelicourt D, Sundareswaran K, Mirabella L . Fontan hemodynamics from 100 patient-specific cardiac magnetic resonance studies: a computational fluid dynamics analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148(4):1481-9. PMC: 6815671. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.11.060. View