» Articles » PMID: 26697067

Comparing the Air Abrasion Cutting Efficacy of Dentine Using a Fluoride-Containing Bioactive Glass Versus an Alumina Abrasive: An In Vitro Study

Overview
Journal Int J Dent
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2015 Dec 24
PMID 26697067
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Air abrasion as a caries removal technique is less aggressive than conventional techniques and is compatible for use with adhesive restorative materials. Alumina, while being currently the most common abrasive used for cutting, has controversial health and safety issues and no remineralisation properties. The alternative, a bioactive glass, 45S5, has the advantage of promoting hard tissue remineralisation. However, 45S5 is slow as a cutting abrasive and lacks fluoride in its formulation. The aim of this study was to compare the cutting efficacy of dentine using a customised fluoride-containing bioactive glass Na0SR (38-80 μm) versus the conventional alumina abrasive (29 μm) in an air abrasion set-up. Fluoride was incorporated into Na0SR to enhance its remineralisation properties while strontium was included to increase its radiopacity. Powder outflow rate was recorded prior to the cutting tests. Principal air abrasion cutting tests were carried out on pristine ivory dentine. The abrasion depths were quantified and compared using X-ray microtomography. Na0SR was found to create deeper cavities than alumina (p < 0.05) despite its lower powder outflow rate and predictably reduced hardness. The sharper edges of the Na0SR glass particles might improve the cutting efficiency. In conclusion, Na0SR was more efficacious than alumina for air abrasion cutting of dentine.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of laser fluorescence in assessment of various caries removal techniques: an in vitro validation.

Kanar O, Tagtekin D, Korkut B, Yanikoglu F, Kargul B BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1529.

PMID: 39707310 PMC: 11662415. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05323-1.


Clinical Effectiveness of Air Abrasion When Compared to Conventional Acid-etching Technique in Enhancing the Retention of Pit and Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review.

Bhadule S, Kalaskar R, Kalaskar A, Krishnakumar K, Joshi S, Balasubramanian S Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024; 17(3):377-384.

PMID: 39144511 PMC: 11320793. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2782.


Evaluation of dentin features in teeth after caries removal by three techniques (chemomechanical, mechanical with a smart bur, and air-abrasion): an study.

Abdul-Kareem Mahmood M, Khairi Al-Hadithi H, Hussein H PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17717.

PMID: 39026539 PMC: 11257054. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17717.


Air-Abrasion in Dentistry: A Short Review of the Materials and Performance Parameters.

Eram A, Vinay Kr R, K N C, Keni L, Shetty D, Zuber M J Biomed Phys Eng. 2024; 14(1):99-110.

PMID: 38357598 PMC: 10862117. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2310-1670.

References
1.
Chen X, Chen X, Brauer D, Wilson R, Hill R, Karpukhina N . Bioactivity of Sodium Free Fluoride Containing Glasses and Glass-Ceramics. Materials (Basel). 2017; 7(8):5470-5487. PMC: 5456181. DOI: 10.3390/ma7085470. View

2.
Radziun E, Dudkiewicz Wilczynska J, Ksiazek I, Nowak K, Anuszewska E, Kunicki A . Assessment of the cytotoxicity of aluminium oxide nanoparticles on selected mammalian cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2011; 25(8):1694-700. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.07.010. View

3.
Tyas M, Anusavice K, Frencken J, Mount G . Minimal intervention dentistry--a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J. 2000; 50(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2000.tb00540.x. View

4.
Featherstone J . Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999; 27(1):31-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb01989.x. View

5.
Griffin S, Oong E, Kohn W, Vidakovic B, Gooch B, Bader J . The effectiveness of sealants in managing caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2008; 87(2):169-74. DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700211. View