» Articles » PMID: 26691876

A Reference Relative Time-scale As an Alternative to Chronological Age for Cohorts with Long Follow-up

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2015 Dec 23
PMID 26691876
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Epidemiologists have debated the appropriate time-scale for cohort survival studies; chronological age or time-on-study being two such time-scales. Importantly, assessment of risk factors may depend on the choice of time-scale. Recently, chronological or attained age has gained support but a case can be made for a 'reference relative time-scale' as an alternative which circumvents difficulties that arise with this and other scales. The reference relative time of an individual participant is the integral of a reference population hazard function between time of entry and time of exit of the individual. The objective here is to describe the reference relative time-scale, illustrate its use, make comparison with attained age by simulation and explain its relationship to modern and traditional epidemiologic methods.

Results: A comparison was made between two models; a stratified Cox model with age as the time-scale versus an un-stratified Cox model using the reference relative time-scale. The illustrative comparison used a UK cohort of cotton workers, with differing ages at entry to the study, with accrual over a time period and with long follow-up. Additionally, exponential and Weibull models were fitted since the reference relative time-scale analysis need not be restricted to the Cox model. A simulation study showed that analysis using the reference relative time-scale and analysis using chronological age had very similar power to detect a significant risk factor and both were equally unbiased. Further, the analysis using the reference relative time-scale supported fully-parametric survival modelling and allowed percentile predictions and mortality curves to be constructed.

Conclusions: The reference relative time-scale was a viable alternative to chronological age, led to simplification of the modelling process and possessed the defined features of a good time-scale as defined in reliability theory. The reference relative time-scale has several interpretations and provides a unifying concept that links contemporary approaches in survival and reliability analysis to the traditional epidemiologic methods of Poisson regression and standardised mortality ratios. The community of practitioners has not previously made this connection.

Citing Articles

Childhood contact with social services and risk of suicide or sudden death in young adulthood: identifying hidden risk in a population-wide cohort study.

McKenna S, OReilly D, Maguire A J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023; 78(1):47-53.

PMID: 37821223 PMC: 10715544. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2023-220975.


Retinal vascular measures from diabetes retinal screening photographs and risk of incident dementia in type 2 diabetes: A GoDARTS study.

Doney A, Nar A, Huang Y, Trucco E, MacGillivray T, Connelly P Front Digit Health. 2022; 4:945276.

PMID: 36120710 PMC: 9470757. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.945276.


Safety and Efficacy of Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Elderly Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients.

Theiler D, Cattaneo M, Dierickx L, Igaz P, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Bournaud C Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(24).

PMID: 34944910 PMC: 8699207. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246290.


Assessing Effectiveness of Colonic and Gynecological Risk Reducing Surgery in Lynch Syndrome Individuals.

Duenas N, Navarro M, Teule A, Solanes A, Salinas M, Iglesias S Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(11).

PMID: 33218006 PMC: 7698735. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113419.


Primary healthcare expansion and mortality in Brazil's urban poor: A cohort analysis of 1.2 million adults.

Hone T, Saraceni V, Coeli C, Trajman A, Rasella D, Millett C PLoS Med. 2020; 17(10):e1003357.

PMID: 33125387 PMC: 7598481. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003357.


References
1.
Gail M, Graubard B, Williamson D, Flegal K . Comments on 'Choice of time scale and its effect on significance of predictors in longitudinal studies' by Michael J. Pencina, Martin G. Larson and Ralph B. D'Agostino, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:1343-1359. Stat Med. 2009; 28(8):1315-7. PMC: 2674613. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3473. View

2.
Pencina M, Larson M, DAgostino R . Choice of time scale and its effect on significance of predictors in longitudinal studies. Stat Med. 2006; 26(6):1343-59. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2699. View

3.
Ingram D, Makuc D, Feldman J . Re: "Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice of the time-scale". Am J Epidemiol. 1997; 146(6):528-9. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009309. View

4.
Andersen P, Borch-Johnsen K, Deckert T, Green A, Hougaard P, Keiding N . A Cox regression model for the relative mortality and its application to diabetes mellitus survival data. Biometrics. 1985; 41(4):921-32. View

5.
LOOMIS D, Richardson D, Elliott L . Poisson regression analysis of ungrouped data. Occup Environ Med. 2005; 62(5):325-9. PMC: 1741003. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2004.017459. View