» Articles » PMID: 26691158

Increased Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions in Mice with a Detached Tectorial Membrane

Overview
Date 2015 Dec 23
PMID 26691158
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mutations in genes encoding tectorial membrane (TM) proteins are a significant cause of human hereditary hearing loss (Hildebrand et al. 2011), and several mouse models have been developed to study the functional significance of this accessory structure in the mammalian cochlea. In this study, we use otoacoustic emissions (OAE), signals obtained from the ear canal that provide a measure of cochlear function, to characterize a mouse in which the TM is detached from the spiral limbus due to an absence of otoancorin (Otoa, Lukashkin et al. 2012). Our results demonstrate that spontaneous emissions (SOAE), sounds produced in the cochlea without stimulation, increase dramatically in mice with detached TMs even though their hearing sensitivity is reduced. This behavior is unusual because wild-type (WT) controls are rarely spontaneous emitters. SOAEs in mice lacking Otoa predominate around 7 kHz, which is much lower than in either WT animals when they generate SOAEs or in mutant mice in which the TM protein Ceacam16 is absent (Cheatham et al. 2014). Although both mutants lack Hensen's stripe, loss of this TM feature is only observed in regions coding frequencies greater than ~15 kHz in WT mice so its loss cannot explain the low-frequency, de novo SOAEs observed in mice lacking Otoa. The fact that ~80 % of mice lacking Otoa produce SOAEs even when they generate smaller distortion product OAEs suggests that the active process is still functioning in these mutants but the system(s) involved have become less stable due to alterations in TM structure.

Citing Articles

Conditions Underlying the Appearance of Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions in Mammals.

Manley G J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024; 25(4):303-311.

PMID: 38760548 PMC: 11349964. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00950-5.


Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Abdala C, Luo P, Shera C J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022; 23(5):647-664.

PMID: 35804277 PMC: 9613820. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-022-00857-z.


Otoacoustic Emissions in Non-Mammals.

Manley G Audiol Res. 2022; 12(3):260-272.

PMID: 35645197 PMC: 9149831. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres12030027.


Unloading outer hair cell bundles in vivo does not yield evidence of spontaneous oscillations in the mouse cochlea.

Quinones P, Meenderink S, Applegate B, Oghalai J Hear Res. 2022; 423:108473.

PMID: 35287989 PMC: 9339463. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108473.


Whistling While it Works: Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions and the Cochlear Amplifier.

Shera C J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022; 23(1):17-25.

PMID: 34981262 PMC: 8782959. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00829-9.


References
1.
Legan P, Lukashkina V, Goodyear R, Kossi M, Russell I, Richardson G . A targeted deletion in alpha-tectorin reveals that the tectorial membrane is required for the gain and timing of cochlear feedback. Neuron. 2000; 28(1):273-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00102-1. View

2.
Kammerer R, Ruttiger L, Riesenberg R, Schauble C, Krupar R, Kamp A . Loss of mammal-specific tectorial membrane component carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 16 (CEACAM16) leads to hearing impairment at low and high frequencies. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287(26):21584-98. PMC: 3381124. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.320481. View

3.
Mom T, Bonfils P, Gilain L, Avan P . Origin of cubic difference tones generated by high-intensity stimuli: effect of ischemia and auditory fatigue on the gerbil cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 110(3 Pt 1):1477-88. DOI: 10.1121/1.1390337. View

4.
Martin P, Bozovic D, Choe Y, Hudspeth A . Spontaneous oscillation by hair bundles of the bullfrog's sacculus. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(11):4533-48. PMC: 2174909. View

5.
Carvalho S, Mom T, Gilain L, Avan P . Frequency specificity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions produced by high-level tones despite inefficient cochlear electromechanical feedback. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 116(3):1639-48. DOI: 10.1121/1.1777873. View