» Articles » PMID: 26687731

Effect of Ovariohysterectomy at the Time of Tumor Removal in Dogs with Mammary Carcinomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Date 2015 Dec 22
PMID 26687731
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ovarian hormones play crucial roles in mammary carcinogenesis. However, whether ovarian ablation by ovariohysterectomy (OHE) improves the prognosis in dogs with mammary carcinomas is unclear.

Objectives: Determine if OHE at the time of mastectomy improves the prognosis in dogs with mammary carcinomas and evaluate if hormonal factors influence the effect of OHE.

Animals: Sixty intact dogs with mammary carcinomas.

Methods: Dogs were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo OHE (n = 31) or not (n = 29) at the time of tumor removal. Peri-surgical serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone concentrations were measured, tumor diagnosis was confirmed histologically, and tumor estrogen and progesterone receptor status was immunohistochemically determined. The dogs were monitored for recurrence and metastases every 3-4 months for at least 2 years. Uni- and multivariable survival analyses were performed with relapse and all-cause death as endpoints in addition to univariable subgroup analyses.

Results: Overall, OHE did not significantly decrease hazard of relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; P = .18) or all-cause death (HR, 0.87; P = .64) in univariable analyses. In multivariable analysis OHE did not significantly influence the hazard of relapse (HR, 0.54; P = .12), but an interaction effect was identified between ER status and E2 (P = .037). Subgroup analysis identified decreased hazard of relapse in the OHE group compared to the non-OHE group in the subsets of dogs with increased E2 (HR, 0.22; P = .012) or grade 2 tumors (HR, 0.26; P = .02).

Conclusion: Dogs with grade 2, ER-positive tumors, or with increased peri-surgical serum E2 concentration represent a subset of dogs with mammary carcinomas likely to benefit from OHE.

Citing Articles

Mammary neoplasms in female dogs: Clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.

Rueda J, Porto C, Franco R, da Costa I, Bueno L, Girio R Vet Med (Praha). 2024; 69(4):99-114.

PMID: 38751991 PMC: 11093647. DOI: 10.17221/4/2024-VETMED.


Three-Dimensional Cultivation a Valuable Tool for Modelling Canine Mammary Gland Tumour Behaviour In Vitro.

Huniadi M, Nosalova N, Almasiova V, Hornakova L, Valencakova A, Hudakova N Cells. 2024; 13(8.

PMID: 38667310 PMC: 11049302. DOI: 10.3390/cells13080695.


Risk factor analysis and clinicopathological characteristics of female dogs with mammary tumours from a single-center retrospective study in Poland.

Dolka I, Czopowicz M, Stopka D, Wojtkowska A, Kaszak I, Sapierzynski R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5569.

PMID: 38448646 PMC: 10917774. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56194-z.


Identifying the Risk Factors for Malignant Mammary Tumors in Dogs: A Retrospective Study.

da Silva E, Dos Santos T, Silva M Vet Sci. 2023; 10(10).

PMID: 37888559 PMC: 10610602. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10100607.


Prognostic Factors for Cancer-Specific Survival and Disease-Free Interval of Dogs with Mammary Carcinomas.

da Silva Soares E, Valente F, Rocha C, Pereira C, Sarandy T, de Oliveira F Vet Med Int. 2023; 2023:6890707.

PMID: 37577730 PMC: 10421712. DOI: 10.1155/2023/6890707.


References
1.
Pena L, De Andres P, Clemente M, Cuesta P, Perez-Alenza M . Prognostic value of histological grading in noninflammatory canine mammary carcinomas in a prospective study with two-year follow-up: relationship with clinical and histological characteristics. Vet Pathol. 2012; 50(1):94-105. DOI: 10.1177/0300985812447830. View

2.
Nieto A, Pena L, Perez-Alenza M, Sanchez M, Flores J, Castano M . Immunohistologic detection of estrogen receptor alpha in canine mammary tumors: clinical and pathologic associations and prognostic significance. Vet Pathol. 2000; 37(3):239-47. DOI: 10.1354/vp.37-3-239. View

3.
Concannon P . Reproductive cycles of the domestic bitch. Anim Reprod Sci. 2010; 124(3-4):200-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.028. View

4.
Philibert J, Snyder P, Glickman N, Glickman L, Knapp D, Waters D . Influence of host factors on survival in dogs with malignant mammary gland tumors. J Vet Intern Med. 2003; 17(1):102-6. DOI: 10.1892/0891-6640(2003)017<0102:iohfos>2.3.co;2. View

5.
Bronden L, Nielsen S, Toft N, Kristensen A . Data from the Danish veterinary cancer registry on the occurrence and distribution of neoplasms in dogs in Denmark. Vet Rec. 2010; 166(19):586-90. DOI: 10.1136/vr.b4808. View