» Articles » PMID: 26687472

Outcomes in Revision Tommy John Surgery in Major League Baseball Pitchers

Overview
Date 2015 Dec 22
PMID 26687472
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: With the recent rise in the number of Tommy John surgeries, a proportionate rise in revisions is expected. However, much is unknown regarding the current revision rate of Tommy John surgery, return to play, and change in performance in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers.

Methods: Publicly available databases were used to obtain a list of all MLB pitchers who underwent primary and revision Tommy John surgery. Pitching performance preoperatively and postoperatively for pitchers who returned to 1 or more MLB games after revision surgery was compared with controls matched for age and position.

Results: Since 1999, 235 MLB pitchers have undergone Tommy John surgeries; 31 pitchers (13.2%) underwent revision surgery, and 37% underwent revision within 3 years of the index procedure. Twenty-six revisions had more than 2 years of follow-up; 17 pitchers (65.4%) returned to pitch at least 1 major league game, whereas only 11 (42.3%) returned to pitch 10 or more games. Of those who returned to MLB competition, the average length of recovery was 20.76 months. Compared with controls matched for age and position, MLB pitchers undergoing revision surgery had a statistically shorter career after revision surgery (4.9 vs 2.6 seasons, P = .002), pitched fewer innings, and had fewer total pitches per season.

Conclusions: The rate of revision Tommy John surgery is substantially higher than previously reported. For MLB pitchers, return to play after revision surgery is much lower than after primary reconstruction. The overall durability of MLB pitchers after revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction decreases significantly compared with controls matched for age and matched controls.

Citing Articles

The major league baseball pitch clock: First year analysis of pitcher injuries.

Puga T, Scigliano N, Box M, Riehl J J Orthop. 2024; 57:133-136.

PMID: 39027353 PMC: 466971. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.06.022.


Twisting technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow: new possibilities toward enhancing the strength of autografts.

Furushima K, Takahashi T, Funakoshi T, Itoh Y JSES Int. 2024; 8(3):614-619.

PMID: 38707581 PMC: 11064566. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.12.003.


Rehabilitation Protocols in Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review of Articles Published in the Last 20 Years.

Buchanan T, Hones K, Hao K, Kamarajugadda S, Portnoff B, Wright J Sports Health. 2024; :19417381241249125.

PMID: 38702939 PMC: 11569531. DOI: 10.1177/19417381241249125.


Hypertrophy of the sublime tubercle in elbow ulnar collateral ligament injuries: a case series of baseball pitchers undergoing ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with short-term follow-up.

Vaswani R, Fu M, Dines J, Boddapati V, Erickson B, Lebus G JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 2(4):513-519.

PMID: 37588466 PMC: 10426510. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.06.003.


The 50 most impactful articles on the medial ulnar collateral ligament: An altmetric analysis of online media.

Kirloskar K, Civilette M, Rate W, Cohen A, Haislup B, Nayar S SAGE Open Med. 2022; 10:20503121221129921.

PMID: 36451777 PMC: 9703534. DOI: 10.1177/20503121221129921.