» Articles » PMID: 26681503

Prevalence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in Canadian Commercial Pork Processing Plants

Overview
Date 2015 Dec 19
PMID 26681503
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: This study investigated the prevalence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), their spa-types, and antimicrobial resistance profiles at various steps during commercial pork production from three plants designated as A, B and C.

Methods And Results: Over a period of 1 year 2640 samples from three commercial pork plants were obtained on a rotating basis. Sample sources were: nasal swabs after bleeding (NSAB), nasal swab after scalding (NSASs, plant C) or skinning (NSASk, plants A, B), carcass swabs after pasteurization (CSAP, plant C) or washing (CSAW, plants A, B) and retail pork (RP). Overall MRSA prevalence at each sampling point in the pork plants after adjusting for clustering was: 61·93, 28·38 7·58 and 1·21% for NSAB, NSASc/Sk, CSAP/CSAW and RP respectively. The majority of MRSA isolates from the three pork plants belonged to livestock-associated MRSA spa-types t034 and t011 (3·8%; ST398). The mainly human spa-type t002 (15%) was also recovered. All MRSA isolates were resistant to β-lactam and tetracycline antibiotics. Overall resistance to tigecycline was found in about 10% of MRSA isolates while <3% isolates were resistant to daptomycin, gentamicin, quinupristin/dalfopristin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

Conclusion: A higher prevalence of MRSA in the nasal cavity of incoming pigs was observed at all three plants, but a notable reduction in MRSA along the pork processing steps occurred.

Significance And Impact Of The Study: The highest prevalence of MRSA was found in the nasal cavity of incoming pigs in three commercial pig slaughter and pork processing plants. A reduction in MRSA prevalence occurred along the processing chain, and pork products from these plants showed significantly lower MRSA than the initial steps of slaughter and processing, suggesting a reduction in MRSA during the slaughter process with minimal cross-contamination.

Citing Articles

Mechanisms of tigecycline resistance in Gram-negative bacteria: A narrative review.

Su W, Wang W, Li L, Zhang M, Xu H, Fu C Eng Microbiol. 2024; 4(3):100165.

PMID: 39629109 PMC: 11610970. DOI: 10.1016/j.engmic.2024.100165.


Investigation into the prevalence of enterotoxin genes and genetic background of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from retain foods in Hangzhou, China.

Chen Q, Zhao G, Yang W, Chen F, Qi Y, Lou Z BMC Microbiol. 2023; 23(1):294.

PMID: 37848808 PMC: 10580612. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-023-03027-0.


Potential of Natural Phenolic Compounds as Antimicrobial Agents against Multidrug-Resistant in Chicken Meat.

Morshdy A, Abdallah K, Abdallah H, Algahtani F, Elabbasy M, Atique S Molecules. 2023; 28(18).

PMID: 37764518 PMC: 10535414. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28186742.


Tigecycline Resistance-Associated Mutations in the MepA Efflux Pump in Staphylococcus aureus.

Huang H, Wan P, Luo X, Lu Y, Li X, Xiong W Microbiol Spectr. 2023; 11(4):e0063423.

PMID: 37432114 PMC: 10434020. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00634-23.


A review of new emerging livestock-associated methicillin-resistant from pig farms.

Khairullah A, Kurniawan S, Effendi M, Sudjarwo S, Ramandinianto S, Widodo A Vet World. 2023; 16(1):46-58.

PMID: 36855358 PMC: 9967705. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.46-58.