» Articles » PMID: 26674332

White and Gray Matter Damage in Primary Progressive MS: The Chicken or the Egg?

Overview
Journal Neurology
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Dec 18
PMID 26674332
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The temporal relationship between white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) damage in vivo in early primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) was investigated testing 2 hypotheses: (1) WM tract abnormalities predict subsequent changes in the connected cortex ("primary WM damage model"); and (2) cortical abnormalities predict later changes in connected WM tracts ("primary GM damage model").

Methods: Forty-seven patients with early PPMS and 18 healthy controls had conventional and magnetization transfer imaging at baseline; a subgroup of 35 patients repeated the protocol after 2 years. Masks of the corticospinal tracts, genu of the corpus callosum and optic radiations, and of connected cortical regions, were used for extracting the mean magnetization transfer ratio (MTR). Multiple regressions within each of 5 tract-cortex pairs were performed, adjusting for the dependent variable's baseline MTR; tract lesion load and MTR, spinal cord area, age, and sex were examined for potential confounding.

Results: The baseline MTR of most regions was lower in patients than in healthy controls. The tract-cortex pair relationships in the primary WM damage model were significant for the bilateral motor pair and right visual pair, while those in the primary GM damage model were only significant for the right motor pair. Lower lesion MTR at baseline was associated with lower MTR in the same tract normal-appearing WM at 2 years in 3 tracts.

Conclusion: These results are consistent with the hypothesis that in early PPMS, cortical damage is for the most part a sequela of normal-appearing WM pathology, which, in turn, is predicted by abnormalities within WM lesions.

Citing Articles

Disproportional smaller fornix with altered microstructure in pediatric multiple sclerosis shown by high-resolution fluid-suppressed diffusion tractography.

Weber C, Wilbur C, Blevins G, Beaulieu C Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2025; 11(1):20552173251315161.

PMID: 39895880 PMC: 11783520. DOI: 10.1177/20552173251315161.


The evolving contribution of MRI measures towards the prediction of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Ananthavarathan P, Sahi N, Chung K, Haider L, Prados F, Trip S J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024; .

PMID: 39038948 PMC: 7616528. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2024-333917.


Using the Progression Independent of Relapse Activity Framework to Unveil the Pathobiological Foundations of Multiple Sclerosis.

Ciccarelli O, Barkhof F, Calabrese M, De Stefano N, Eshaghi A, Filippi M Neurology. 2024; 103(1):e209444.

PMID: 38889384 PMC: 11226318. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209444.


Abnormal eye movements increase as motor disabilities and cognitive impairments become more evident in Multiple Sclerosis: A novel eye-tracking study.

Gerardo F, Barbara E, Cecilia G, Aldana M, Natalia C, Lucia B Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2024; 10(2):20552173241255008.

PMID: 38817553 PMC: 11138185. DOI: 10.1177/20552173241255008.


Multimodal MRI study on the relation between WM integrity and connected GM atrophy and its effect on disability in early multiple sclerosis.

Weeda M, van Nederpelt D, Twisk J, Brouwer I, Kuijer J, Van Dam M J Neurol. 2023; 271(1):355-373.

PMID: 37716917 PMC: 10769935. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11937-2.


References
1.
Carpenter J, Bithell J . Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med. 2000; 19(9):1141-64. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000515)19:9<1141::aid-sim479>3.0.co;2-f. View

2.
Tozer D, Chard D, Bodini B, Ciccarelli O, Miller D, Thompson A . Linking white matter tracts to associated cortical grey matter: a tract extension methodology. Neuroimage. 2011; 59(4):3094-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.088. View

3.
Bjartmar C, Trapp B . Axonal and neuronal degeneration in multiple sclerosis: mechanisms and functional consequences. Curr Opin Neurol. 2001; 14(3):271-8. DOI: 10.1097/00019052-200106000-00003. View

4.
Filippi M, Rocca M, Barkhof F, Bruck W, Chen J, Comi G . Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11(4):349-60. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70003-0. View

5.
Stys P, Zamponi G, van Minnen J, Geurts J . Will the real multiple sclerosis please stand up?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012; 13(7):507-14. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3275. View